Applying Some Tillage Practices and Organic Waste Low Economic Value to Enhance the Productivity of Calcareous Soil and Some Oil Crops.

Document Type : Research papers

Authors

1 improvement and conservation soils, SWERI, A.R.C.

2 Soils, Water and Envir. Res., Inst., Agri. Res. Center, Giza, Egypt

Abstract

To achieve self-sufficiency for oil crops in Egypt. It needs a management as apply tillage practices with organic waste. So, an experiment was conducted at the Agricultural Research Station in Noubaria. It was planted with sunflower seeds, Sakha 53 summer 2021, followed by planting canola, Serw4 winter season. To study the effect of two different tillage practices, with applying of organic waste alone or mixed with compost on the productivity of calcareous soil and sunflower and canola crops. Results showed that: applying different tillage methods and organic waste had significant effects on ECe, pH, and OM values and the availability of N, P, K, Zn, and Fe mg kg-1 values in calcareous soil.

Moreover, tillage methods had significant effects on the availability of Zn and Fe mg kg-1 values. Data revealed that seed yield (kg ha-1), Oil % of sunflower and canola crops, P, K, Zn, and Fe contents were significantly affected by deep tillage higher than surface tillage. Also, by applying organic treatments. Tillage methods had a significant effect on Oil % in the canola crop and Zn and Fe (kg ha-1) values content of both crops.

The agronomic efficiency (kg kg-1) and recovery of N, P, and K % in seed yield of sunflower and canola crops were increased significantly by applying both tillage practices. Also, the same trend was noticed for both the agronomic efficiency and recovery of N, P, and K % in both crops. Investment ratio values increased due to applying organic waste low value.

Keywords

Main Subjects


INTRODUCTION

        The cultivation of newly reclaimed sandy and calcareous soil has become an unavoidable necessity for increasing our agricultural production to meet the ever-growing demand for food. Desert covers about 96% of the total area of Egypt; most of which are scattered in the eastern and western banks of the Nile Valley and Delta (Abou Hussien et al., 2019). Calcareous lands with difficult agricultural characteristics are widespread in northern Egypt. Sugar beet waste is also available because there are factories that extract sugar from beets. Due to the difficulty of collecting all this waste to produce compost, this requires a high additional production cost and time. The intricate relationship between compost utilization and subsequent oil production underscores the importance of sustainable agricultural practices in meeting the rising demands for edible oils (Elsherpiny et al., 2023).

         On the other hand, the Ministry of Agriculture and Soil Reclamation in Egypt is actively pursuing the sustainable expansion of oil crops, particularly through the cultivation of sunflower, canola, and different oil crops to decrease the import gap for various oil products and edible oils (Faiyad et al., 2023; Mohamed et al., 2024). A critical component in optimizing oil crop production lies in the enhancement of soil health and fertility. Compost, derived from plant residues such as rice straw and soybean Stover, serves as a valuable soil amendment (Rashwan et al., 2024)

        Canola (Brassica napus L.) has been identified as a promising crop for production in Egypt to increase the country’s edible oil supply. Over the last decades, canola has become a crop of high global agro-economic importance, featuring a wide range of uses for food, feed, and fuel purposes. It currently holds the third position among oil crops after palm oil and soybean (FAO, 2018). Also, the international oilseed market is dominated mainly by sunflowers and other oilseeds, so there is a need to intensify efforts to expand sunflower output to meet the demand for edible sunflower seeds, oil, and by-products (Taher et al., 2017).

          Canola has proved potential to be productive in Egypt even under salinity, heat, and drought stress in newly reclaimed arable land outside the Nile valley (Abdallah et al., 2010). Conversely, Elemike et al. (2019) indicate that producers have increased sunflower crop productivity by using fertilizers and these fertilizers have caused soil weakness, desertification, and even a decrease in vitality after years. The conventional agricultural practice of using chemical fertilizers for better crop yields and productivity adversely affects crop yield, physical and chemical properties of soil, and microbial ecological imbalance. Therefore, producers have started to use organic fertilizers to improve the physical and chemical structure of soils. The use of organic fertilizers should be expanded to reduce environmental pollution, guarantee sustainable soils, and reduce inorganic fertilizer use; especially as there are huge amounts of agricultural wastes produced every year in Egypt that could be effectively turned into organic fertilizer production (Khodae-Joghan et al., 2018). The rated amount of agricultural waste in Egypt ranges from 22 to 26 million dry tons per year and can cause numerous problems in rural areas in Egypt (Shaaban and Nasr, 2018).

        Although tillage systems and crop rotations can affect crop production and uptake of nutrients, their long-term effects, particularly their interactions, are not well-documented (Soon and Clayton, 2002). Tillage systems can change the distribution of nutrients and roots in different layers of soil (Cannell and Hawes, 1994); Ball-Coelho et al., 1998). Hargrove (1985) showed that tillage affected the distribution of soil nutrients as early as the first year of treatment. Nutrient concentrations were higher in the surface soil layer under no-till as compared to conventional tillage (Franzluebbers and Hons, 1996). Consequently, nutrient acquisition by crop plants may be affected by the type of tillage used in the production system.

          This study aims to improve the service and properties of calcareous soils in the long term by adding organic waste as a resource for sustainable agriculture. This study focused on evaluating the best way to add residues and the best plowing methods under the conditions of these calcareous lands

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 

A field experiment was conducted on a calcareous sandy loam soil at El-Nubaria Agricultural Research Station, El Behira Governorate, Egypt (lat. 310.01´ & 310.11´ and between long. 30 0.10´ & 30 0.25´) during two successive seasons (sunflower in summer season (2021) and Canola in winter season, 2021/2022) in the same place, respectively. The experimental design was in a split-plot with four replicates. To examine the impacts of the applied treatments on improving calcareous soil productivity and comparing the low economic by-products as organic waste with compost (organic materials). The main plots were two tillage methods and the organic materials treatments were sub-main plots. This experiment included the following treatments:

1-Tillage methods: surface tillage (0 – 30 cm) and deep tillage (0 – 60 cm)

2- organic materials:

  • Sugar beet waste (SBW) (outperforms or liming on its own and is applied at a rate of 14.28                Mg ha-1.   
  • Compost (Comp.) applied at a rate of 19.04       Mg ha-1.    
  • A mixture of compost with sugar beet waste was applied as 50% from each of them, the application of organic materials based on their OC percent content, they were adjusted and ground to less than 5 mm size.
  • Control treatment (cont.) (without organic fertilizer). In the summer, season (2021) the experimental field was prepared, and homogeneously mixed with the amendments (sugar beet waste) and compost. The plot's total area was 14 m2. The seeds of sunflowers were planted (Helianthus annuus, var. Sakha 53) at a rate of 9.5 kg ha-1 during the first week of June. All the fertilizers were added according to the recommendation of the Ministry of Agriculture. Phosphorus and potassium were applied with a rate of 107.1 kg P2O5 ha-1 and 57.1 kg K2O ha-1 in the forms of superphosphate (15.5 % P2O5) and potassium sulfate (48 % K2O), respectively, before planting. While, nitrogen was applied as ammonium nitrate (33.5% N) at a rate of 142.8 kg N ha-1, at two equal doses after 45 and 75 days from sowing.

        Canola seeds (Brassica napus L., var. Serw4) in the second week of November were planted at a rate of 9.5 kg ha-1 in the same place in the following winter season (2021/2022), after returning the land to service and adding the same treatments. Recommended doses of phosphorus, potassium, and nitrogen fertilizer were added as mentioned above. All the fertilizers were added according to the recommendation of the Ministry of Agriculture.

         Plant analysis: At the harvesting stage, in both seasons (summer and winter) the total yield for each plot for different seasons was weighed and converted to       Mg ha-1. The wet digestion method was used according to Sommers and Nelson (1972) to determine N, P, K, Zn, and Fe in plants as described by Chapman and Pratt (1961), Total nitrogen by micro-Kjeldahl, Total phosphorus colorimetrically in aliquots of digested samples in sulphomolybdic acid and ascorbic system and total potassium by flame – photometrically. Total iron, zinc, and manganese by atomic absorption spectrophotometer instrument.

        Organic materials analysis: pH in (1:10: water suspension), total soluble salts in (1: 10 water extract). Total organic matter by Schollenberger oxidizable organic carbon method, was determined according to Page et al. (1982). Total nitrogen was determined using the Kjeldahl digestion method (UDK 139/code F 30200 130) as described by Jackson (1973). Total phosphorus, potassium, iron, zinc, and manganese were determined in the extract described by Brunner and Wasmer (1978). Phosphorus was measured by spectrophotometer (SPECTRONIC 21D NARP 100034). Potassium was measured by flame photometer and micronutrients by atomic absorption spectrophotometer instrument.

Soil analyses: Soil samples at a depth of 0-15 cm were collected at the end of each season after harvesting both crops; a chemical analysis was carried out. The organic carbon percentage was determined according to Jackson (1958). Electric conductivity (EC) was measured in soil paste using the method described by Page et al. (1982). Soil pH value was determined in (1:2.5, soil water suspension) (Jackson, 1973). Organic matter content was determined according to the Walkley and Black (1934) titration method (Jackson, 1973). Available nitrogen as described by Page (1982), Available phosphorus as described by Jackson (1973), and Available potassium was determined using a flame photometer as described by Richards (1954), and Available micronutrients (Fe and Zn) according to Lindsay and Norvell (1978).

All collected data were subjected to statistical analysis of variance and treatment means and were compared using the MSTAT-C computer package to calculate the F ratio according to the Least Significant Differences (LSD) test method as described by MSTAT-C. (1990).

 

 

Table (1). Some soil physical and chemical analyses of the investigated experimental summer and winter seasons.

Soil characteristics

Particle size distribution %

 

Sand

55.71

CaCO3%

22.8

Silt

25.11

OM,%

0.27

Clay

19.18

pH (1:2.5, soil: water suspension)

8.47

Textural class

Sandy Loam

EC  (dSm-1 )

2.18

Available water content %

25.13

 

 

Available macronutrients (mg kg-1)

Available micronutrients (mg kg-1)

N

P

K

Fe

Zn

37.3

2.68

77.3

0.44

0.11

           

 

Table (2): Some chemical analysis of used organic amendments samples.

Amendment

pH

(1:10)

EC

(dSm-1)

OC

%

C\N

Ratio

Macronutrients %

Micronutrient mgKg-1

N

P

K

Fe

Zn

Compost

7.30

3.10

23.43

16.97

1.38

0.62

1.70

160

86

Sugar beet waste    (SBW)

7.20

2.95

34.30

19.06

1.80

0.50

1.80

210

117

Uptake kg ha-1 of (N, P, and K) = (N, P, and K) % in grain × grain yield kg ha-1 × 1000 /100.

 

Nutrient use efficiency was examined as follows:

  1. Agronomic efficiency (AE): is defined as the economic production obtained per unit of nutrient applied. It can be calculated as follows:

 AE (kg  kg-1) =  Yield F – Yield C   (Baligar et al., 2001).                     

                                   (QNA)

Where Yield F is the yield of fertilized crop (kg), Yield C is the yield of unfertilized crop (kg), and QNA is the quantity of nutrient applied (kg).

  1. Apparent nutrient recovery efficiency (ANR): is defined as the quantity of nutrient uptake per unit of nutrient applied. It can be calculated as follows:

ANR (%) =  NUF – NUC  X 100     (Baligar et al., 2001).                         

                         (QNA)

Where: NUF is the nutrient uptake of fertilized crop (kg), NUC is the nutrient uptake of unfertilized crop (kg), and QNA is the quantity of nutrient applied (kg).

Uptake kg ha-1 of (N, P, and K) = (N, P, and K) % in grain × grain yield kg ha-1 × 1000 /100.

Economic evaluation:

Evaluation of the farm profitability of all tested variability was considered and calculated as follows:

NI = TIO – TCI ……………………

NI = Net income LE.

TCI =Total cost input,

TIO = Total income outputs,

I.R = Investment Ratio (economic efficiency) = Output, L.E ha-1  /Input L.E ha-1       According to Rizk (2007)

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The obtained results through this study will be discussed under the following headings: 

  1. Chemical properties of soil:

1.1. Effect of different treatments on soil chemical characteristics after sunflower and canola crops harvest.

   Data in Table 3 indicate that tillage methods and soil organic materials addition had positive and significant effects on the soil EC, pH, and OM values in calcareous soil under this study after sunflower and canola seed crops were harvested. The lowest values of soil pH, EC, and highest values of OM had significant changes in ascending order by applying sugar beet waste                 (low economic value), sugar beet waste + compost, and compost treatments, respectively, compared to the control.  Moreover, there are positive significant effects on pH, EC, and OM values obtained with deep tillage practice. 

The interactions between tillage methods and organic materials improved significantly the soil EC, pH, and OM% values. These findings could be attributed to the increasing organic matter decomposition over time and increasing microorganisms' activity in soil and buffering pH, especially in surface tillage application. Lowering the soil pH value through organic acid and increasing the activity of soil organisms liberates more nutrients from the unavailable reserves (Modaihsh et al., 2005; Khalil, 2016). Also, decreased EC could be due to the increased permeability leading to the leaching of salts in case of deep tillage application (Deepa and Govindarajan, 2002). The decline of soil EC values as a result of the compost applications may be attributed to the improvement of physical soil properties, especially the increase in its hydraulic conductivity and total porosity (El-Gamal, 2015). Also, Mohamed et al. (2007) observed that applying different organic manures decreased soil pH, EC, SAR, and soluble Na+, Cl- and HCO3- while CEC and soluble Ca2+ and Mg2+ increased. They attributed the slight change in values of Ca2+ to increased solubility of CaCO3 due to applied manures.

The improvement some soil chemicals properties by application of compost compared with Sugar beet waste applicatin althought that the sugar beet waste is high contain in some elements than compost.  This result may be due to complte maturated C/N about (1:16)  and decomposition of compost as amendament in the soil. 

 

Table (3). Effect of different treatments on EC, pH, and OM values in calcareous soil after sunflower and canola   

                  crops harvest.

Sunflower yield harvest after 2021 season

Treatments (B)

pH

ECe (dSm-1)

OM (%)

Tillage (A)

Mean (B)

Tillage (A)

Mean (B)

Tillage (A)

Mean (B)

Surface

Deep

Surface

Deep

Surface

Deep

Cont.     

8.45b

8.47a

8.46a

0.95a

0.82b

0.88a

1.20h

1.22g

1.21d

SBW

8.41d

8.42c

8.41b

0.72c

0.62d

0.67b

1.27f

1.29d

1.28c

Comp. + SBW

8.25g

8.39e

8.32c

0.59e

0.51g

0.55c

1.28e

1.39c

1.33b

Comp.

8.12h

8.37f

8.24d

0.55f

0.49h

0.52d

1.49b

1.51a

1.50a

Mean (A)

8.30b

8.41a

 

0.70a

0.61b

 

1.31b

1.35a

 

LSD 0.05 %

A=0.005            B=0.001

A*B=0.002

A=0.005               B=0.001

A*B=0.002

A=0.005             B=0.001

A*B=0.002

Canola yield harvest after 2021/2022 season

Cont.     

8.36b

8.38a

8.37a

0.97a

0.86b

0.91a

0.94g

1.16e

1.05d

SBW

8.32c

8.36b

8.34b

0.86b

0.65d

0.75b

1.07f

1.21c

1.14c

Comp. + SBW

8.22e

8.32c

8.27c

0.68c

0.54f

0.61c

1.16e

1.24b

1.20b

Comp.

8.11f

8.25d

8.18d

0.64e

0.51g

0.57d

1.20d

1.29a

1.24a

Mean (A)

8.25b

8.33a

 

0.78a

0.64b

 

1.09b

1.22a

 

LSD 0.05 %

A=0.005               B=0.001

A*B=0.002

A=0.005                 B=0.001

A*B=0.002

A=0.005                B=0.001

A*B=0.002

Cont.: control; (S.B.W.):  sugar beet waste; Comp.: compost

 

 

1.2, Effect of different treatments on available N, P, and K in calcareous soil after sunflower and canola crops harvest.

            Data in Table 4 indicate that tillage methods and organic treatment addition had positive and significant effects on the availability of N, P, and K values under this study after sunflower and canola harvest. The available N, P, and K values were higher upon the applied sugar beet waste (low economic value), sugar beet waste + compost, and compost, respectively, compared with the control. The increase in available N value might attributed to the N derived from the native N by enhancing microbial activities induced by humic and fulvic acid resulting from the decomposition of the added organic materials. Also, the increase in the availability of P could be attributed to the chemical and biochemical processes involved. The humic acids might have helped in the solubility of P

 

 

insoluble forms to soluble form resulting in its increase. A similar increase was reported by (Khan et al., 1997; Deepa and Govindarajan, 2002). However, the data showed a difference in the effect between tillage methods and an increase in the availability of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium in the soil after harvesting sunflower and canola crops, respectively. The highest N values were recorded in surface tillage compared to the highest values of both available P and K were recorded in deep tillage in the first season after sunflower crop harvest. The residual effect of different treatments on available macronutrients in soil after harvesting sunflower and canola crops in calcareous soil is related to the chemical composition of added compost and its effect on soil chemical properties and its content of available macronutrients. Similar results were obtained by El-Meselawe (2014) and Elgezery (2016).

 

 

 

 

 

Table (4). Effect of different treatments on soil available N, P, and K (mg kg-1) after sunflower and canola crops harvest.

                     Macro elements available in soil (mg kg-1) after sunflower crop harvest

Treatments

(B)

Available N

Available P

Available K

Tillage (A)

Mean (B)

Tillage (A)

Mean (B)

Tillage (A)

Mean (B)

Surface

Deep

Surface

Deep

Surface

Deep

Cont.

137.0f

130.0h

133.5d

6.88h

7.12f

7.00d

160.0g

344.0d

252.0d

SBW

151.0d

132.0g

141.5c

7.08g

7.92d

7.50c

240.0f

345.0c

292.5c

Comp. + SBW

159.0c

144.0e

151.5b

7.24e

9.82b

8.53b

315.0e

394.0b

354.5b

Comp.

165.0b

166.0a

165.5a

8.18c

10.21a

9.19a

344.0d

411.0a

377.5a

Mean (A)

153.0a

143.0b

 

7.34b

8.76a

 

264.8

373.5

 

LSD 5 %

A=0.005            B=0.001

A*B=0.002

A=0.005            B=0.001

A*B=0.002

A=0.005            B=0.001

A*B=0.002

Macro elements available in soil (mg kg-1) after canola crop harvest

Cont.

136.0g

121.0h

128.5d

5.12g

5.56e

5.34d

149.0g

259.0c

204.0d

SBW

151.0f

170.0d

160.5c

5.54f

6.38d

5.96c

171.0f

259.0c

215.0c

Comp. + SBW

159.0e

188.0b

173.5b

8.32b

6.38d

7.35b

196.0e

266.0b

231.0b

Comp.

176.0c

193.0a

184.5a

10.19a

8.24c

9.21a

217.0d

416.0a

316.5a

Mean (A)

155.5b

168.0a

 

7.29a

6.64b

 

183.3b

300.0a

 

LSD 5 %

A=0.005          B=0.0018

A*B=0.002

A=0.005          B=0.001

A*B=0.002

A=0.005            B=0.001

A*B=0.002

Cont.: control; (S.B.W.):  sugar beet waste; Comp.: compost

 

 

1.3. Effect of different treatments on soil available Zn and Fe (mg kg-1) after sunflower and canola crops harvest.

Data in Table 5 indicate that organic materials had a positive and significant effect on the availability of Zn and Fe (mg kg-1) in calcareous soil under study after sunflower and canola crops harvest. The highest values of available Zn and Fe were obtained with the addition of sugar beet waste (low economic value), sugar beet west + compost, and compost compared with control respectively. At the same time, it was noticed that tillage methods had no significant effect on the availability of Zn and Fe (mg kg-1) values in calcareous soil after sunflower and canola crops harvest. These trends are consistent with the chemical composition and nutrient content of the composts and also with their improving effects on calcareous soil properties and their contents of available macro- and micronutrients (Elgezery, 2016; Abou Hussien et al., 2019). Also, this might be attributed to the high decomposition of the organic amendments and its effect on soil biological conditions, nutrient mineralization, and release of essential nutrients in available forms, root development, and thus higher yields (Frøseth et al., 2014).

 

.           

Table (5). Effect of different treatments on soil available Zn and Fe (mg kg-1) after sunflower and canola crops      

                 harvest.

Microelements available in soil (mg kg-1) after sunflower harvest

Treatments

(B)

Zn (mg kg-1)

Fe (mg kg-1)

Tillage (A)

Mean (B)

Tillage (A)

Mean (B)

Surface

Deep

Surface

Deep

Cont.

0.120f

0.130e

0.125d

0.640e

0.440g

0.540d

SBW

0.160c

0.150d

0.155c

0.650d

0.620f

0.635c

Comp. + SBW

0.160c

0.160c

0.160b

0.720c

0.790b

0.755b

Comp.

0.180b

0.190a

0.185a

0.720c

0.860a

0.790a

Mean (A)

0.155a

0.157a

 

0.683a

0.678a

 

LSD 5 %

A=NS   B=0.001   A*B=0.002

A=NS   B=0.001   A*B=0.002

Microelements available in soil (mg kg-1) after canola harvest

Cont.

0.120f

0.130e

0.125d

0.660g

0.670f

0.665d

SBW

0.150d

0.130e

0.140c

0.690e

0.690e

0.690c

Comp. + SBW

0.170b

0.160c

0.165b

0.700d

0.740c

0.720b

Comp.

0.170b

0.190a

0.180a

0.790a

0.760b

0.775a

Mean (A)

0.152a

0.152a

 

0.710a

0.715a

 

LSD 5 %

A=NS   B=0.001   A*B=0.002

A=NS   B=0.001   A*B=0.002

Cont.: control; (B.W.):  sugar beet waste; Comp.: compost

 

 

 

  1. Plant nutrients content:

Data in Table 6 reveal that values of N, P, and K content of seed yield (kg ha-1) of sunflower and canola crops in a calcareous soil were significantly affected by the tillage methods, and their values were higher than those of the surface tillage method except both P and K content in seed yield of canola after had no significant effect after surface tillage practice. Also, the highest values of such parameters values were obtained in ascending order by applying the sugar beet waste (low economic value), sugar beet waste + compost, and compost treatments, respectively as well as when compared with control. These results may be due to the improvement of soil properties affected by a decrease in soil EC and pH values and the increase in OM% in calcareous soil. In this respect, Elgezery (2016) and Abou Hussien et al. (2017) obtained similar results. Also, the addition of organic materials improved the soil's physical properties, such as hydraulic conductivity, infiltration rate, total porosity, and penetration resistance.  Azza. R. Ahmed et al. (2022) confirmed that one of the most prevalent procedures for improving soil physical qualities has been the addition of organic materials from diverse sources to the soil.

 

l.

 

Table (6). Effect of different treatments on N, P, and K contents of seed yield (kg ha-1) of sunflower and canola crops in calcareous soil.

Nutrient contents in seed yield of sunflower (kg ha-1)

Treatments

(B)

N-content in seed (kg ha-1)

P-content in seed (kg ha-1)

K- content in seed (kg ha-1)

Tillage (A)

Mean

(B)

Tillage (A)

Mean

(B)

Tillage (A)

Mean

(B)

Surface

Deep

Surface

Deep

Surface

Deep

Cont.

54.85f

48.09f

51.47d

57.45f

84.07d

70.76d

15.02e

19.16d

17.09d

SBW

64.78e

76.58cd

70.68c

68.69e

95.95c

82.32c

18.86d

23.96c

21.41c

Comp. + SBW

73.71d

95.07b

84.39b

80.32d

114.40b

97.34b

21.16cd

28.65b

24.90b

Comp.

84.08c

106.80a

95.46a

97.24c

150.90a

124.10a

22.28c

37.81a

30.04a

Mean (A)

69.36b

81.64a

 

75.93b

111.30a

 

19.33b

27.39a

 

LSD 5 %

A=11.41     B=6.17

A*B=8.73

A=9.06       B=7.54

A*B=10.67

A=4.22     B=1.99

A*B=2.81

Nutrient contents in seed yield of canola (kg ha-1)

Cont.

61.10e

72.80d

66.95d

9.29e

11.13d

10.21c

9.03e

9.27de

9.15d

SBW

73.57d

86.87c

80.22c

11.30d

13.51c

12.40b

10.91d

13.07c

11.99c

Comp. + SBW

84.97c

107.80b

96.37b

12.76cd

13.48c

13.12b

13.60c

16.45b

15.03b

Comp.

100.60b

146.00a

123.30a

17.07b

18.77a

17.92a

16.32b

21.89a

19.11a

Mean (A)

80.07b

103.40a

 

12.60a

14.22a

 

12.47a

15.17a

 

LSD 5 %

A=21.03       B=5.23

A*B=7.40

A=NS      B=1.17

A*B=1.66

A= NS      B=1.162

A*B=1.643

Cont.: control; (S.B.W.):  sugar beet waste; Comp.: compost

     

 

       Data in Table 7 indicate that tillage methods had a significant effect on Zn and Fe (kg ha-1) values content of seed yield in calcareous soil after sunflower and canola crops harvest. Also, the application of organic materials had a significant effect on the availability of Zn and Fe (mg kg-1) in the soil after sunflower and canola crops harvest. The highest values of availability Zn and Fe were obtained with the addition of organic materials in ascending order sugar beet waste (low economic value), sugar beet waste + compost, and compost compared with control, respectively. These trends are consistent with the chemical composition and nutrient content of the composts and also with their improving effects on calcareous soil properties and its content of available macro- and micronutrients (Elgezery, 2016; Abou Hussien et al., 2019). Also, this might be attributed to the high decomposition of the organic matter and its effect on soil biological conditions, nutrient mineralization, and release of essential nutrients in available forms, root development, and thus higher yields (Frøseth et al., 2014).

 

 

 

Table (7). Effect of different treatments on Zn and Fe contents of seed yield (mg kg-1) of sunflower and canola    

                 crops in calcareous soil. Microelements content in seed yield of sunflower (mg kg-1).

Treatments

(B)

Zn (mg kg-1)

Fe (mg kg-1)

Tillage (A)

Mean (B)

Tillage (A)

Mean (B)

Surface

Deep

Surface

Deep

Cont.

1.66g

1.56h

1.61d

1.29h

1.61e

1.45d

SBW

1.75e

1.71f

1.73c

1.48g

1.69d

1.58c

Comp. + SBW

1.76d

1.77c

1.76b

1.56f

1.73c

1.64b

Comp.

1.89b

1.90a

1.89a

1.81a

1.77b

1.79a

Mean (A)

1.76a

1.73b

 

1.53b

1.70a

 

LSD 5 %

A=0.005   B=0.0018   A*B=0.0025

A=0.0051   B=0.0018   A*B=0.0025

Microelements content in seed yield of canola (mg kg-1 )

Cont.

31.90g

30.50h

31.20d

79.80h

85.20g

82.50d

SBW

37.90f

41.30c

36.60c

88.50f

95.70c

92.10c

Comp. + SBW

39.60e

45.60b

42.60b

89.57e

97.70b

93.63b

Comp.

40.37d

49.10a

44.73a

100.50a

93.50d

97.00a

Mean (A)

35.94b

41.63a

 

89.59b

93.03a

 

LSD 5 %

A=0.434   B=0.153   A*B=0.217

A=0.005   B=0.058   A*B=0.082

Cont.: control; (S.B.W.):  sugar beet waste; Comp.: compost

 

  1. Nutrient use efficiency

Results in Tables (8 and 9) indicate that the agronomic efficiency (kg kg-1) and recovery of N, P and K % in seed yield of sunflower and canola were positive as affected significantly by applying organic material treatments in the calcareous soil. Also, the recovery of N % in the seed yield of sunflower and canola was positive as affected significantly by tillage methods in this calcareous soil except for recovery of P and K % in the seed yield of sunflower and recovery of P % in the seed yield of canola was negative as affected significantly by tillage methods. On the other hand, the agronomic efficiency (kg kg-1) of N and P % in seed yield of sunflower and canola was negative as affected significantly by tillage methods in this calcareous soil except k % in canola seeds had significant by applying deep tillage practice. The agronomic efficiency of N and P and recovery of P have no significant effect for either different tillage practices on the seed yield of two crops or organic material treatments of N on the seed yield of canola and P on the seed yield of sunflower. The recovery of N, P and K % in the seed yield of sunflower and canola crops was increased significantly using the organic amendment sources. These results indicate that the tillage deep method and organic materials led to an increase in the nutrient use efficiency in calcareous soil. On the other hand, the highest values of agronomic efficiency (kg kg-1) and recovery of N, P, and K % in seed yield of sunflower and canola were obtained with the addition of organic amendment sources. The highest values of agronomic efficiency (kg kg-1) and recovery of N, P, and K % in seed yield of sunflower and canola were obtained by applying organic materials in ascending order sugar beet waste (low economic value), sugar beet west + compost and compost, respectively. These results indicate that the organic sources with compost amendments increase nutrient use efficiency in the calcareous soil. This result indicates that the use of sugar beet waste without compost led to decreasing nutrient use efficiency in calcareous soil. These results were confirmed by (Shindo and Nishio, 2005). Finally, the interaction between all factors under study gave the highest significant values of agronomic efficiency (kg kg-1) and recovery of N, P, and K % in seed yield of sunflower and canola crops growing in the calcareous soil.

 

Table (8). Effect of different treatments on N, P, and K recovery (%) in seed yield of sunflower and canola crops  

                  in calcareous soil.  

N, P, and K recovery (%) in seed yield of sunflower harvest

Treatments

(B)

N

P

K

Tillage (A)

Mean (B)

Tillage (A)

Mean (B)

Tillage (A)

Mean(B)

Surface

Deep

Surface

Deep

Surface

Deep

Cont.

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

SBW

2.570f

8.467c

5.518c

4.150e

4.390de

4.270c

1.047c

1.307c

1.177c

Comp. + SBW

4.950e

11.950b

8.452b

7.060cd

9.360bc

8.210b

1.510c

2.330b

1.920b

Comp.

7.237d

14.650a

10.944a

10.540b

17.720a

14.130a

1.623c

4.173a

2.898a

Mean (A)

4.919b

11.689a

 

7.250a

10.490a

 

1.393a

2.603a

 

LSD 5 %

A=0.01 B=0.85 A*B=0.67

A=NS B=3.36 A*B=2.7

A=NS B=0.74 A*B=0.59

N, P, and K recovery (%) in seed yield of canola harvest

Cont.

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

SBW

3.020d

3.473d

3.247c

0.773c

0.877bc

0.825b

0.510d

1.037c

0.773c

Comp. + SBW

5.683c

8.377b

7.030b

1.097b

0.727c

0.912b

1.123c

1.763b

1.443b

Comp.

9.317b

17.470a

13.394a

2.087a

2.027a

2.057a

1.628b

2.823a

2.226a

Mean (A)

6.007b

9.773a

 

1.319a

1.210a

 

1.087b

1.874a

 

LSD 5 %

A=0.42   B=1.65 A*B=1.33

A=NS B=0.40 A*B=0.32

A=0.26 B=0.34 A*B=0.27

Cont.: control; (S.B.W.):  sugar beet waste; Comp.: compost

Table (9). Effect of different treatments on agronomic efficiency (kg kg-1) of seed yield for sunflower and canola

                  crops in calcareous soil.

 

Agronomic efficiency (kg kg-1) on seed yield of sunflower harvest

Treatments

(B)

N

P

K

Tillage (A)

Mean

(B)

Tillage (A)

Mean

(B)

Tillage (A)

Mean

(B)

Surface

Deep

Surface

Deep

 

Surface

Deep

 

Cont.

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

SBW

0.930d

1.270cd

1.100b

1.363a

1.867a

1.615a

6.480d

8.870cd

7.675b

Comp. + SBW

1.476cd

2.601ab

2.039ab

1.830a

3.230a

2.530a

10.380cd

18.330ab

14.355ab

Comp.

1.900bc

3.157a

2.529a

2.040a

3.383a

2.712a

13.480bc

22.410a

17.945a

Mean (A)

1.435a

2.343a

 

1.744a

2.827a

 

10.113a

16.537a

 

LSD 5 %

A=NS B=0.99

A*B=0.79

A=NS B= NS

A*B= NS

A=NS B=6.98

A*B=5.61

Agronomic efficiency (kg kg-1) on seed yield of canola harvest

Cont.

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

SBW

0.683b

0.903b

0.793a

1.010c

1.330c

1.170b

4.783d

6.303cd

5.543b

Comp. + SBW

1.117b

1.060b

1.088a

1.387c

1.317c

1.352b

7.877c

7.470c

7.674b

Comp.

1.963ab

3.907a

2.935a

2.111b

2.603a

2.357a

13.950b

17.220a

15.585a

Mean (A)

1.254a

1.957a

 

1.503a

1.750a

 

8.870b

10.331a

 

LSD 5 %

A=NS B=NS

A*B=2.14

A=NS B=0.48

A*B=0.38

A=0.84 B=2.95

A*B=2.37

Cont.: control; (S.B.W.):  sugar beet waste; Comp.: compost

                     

 

  1. Seed yield of sunflower and canola crops:

Data in Table 10 indicate that positive and significant effects exist in the case of using a deep tillage system on seed yield of both sunflower and canola which is higher than surface tillage in calcareous sandy loam soil. On the other hand, the Oil % in the seed yield of the sunflower crop positively increased and the effects were significant by using the deep tillage method as well as the oil % in the seed yield of the canola crop positively increased, but the effects were not significant.

Also, data clear that the positive and significant effects were obtained with seed yield and Oil % of sunflower and canola obtained with the use of soil organic amendment sources in calcareous sandy loam soil. The highest values of seed yield and Oil % of both sunflower and canola were obtained with the addition of sugar beet waste (low economic value), sugar beet waste + compost, and compost compared with control, respectively.

This may be due to the effect of compost addition with sugar beet waste (low economic value) which plays an important role in the assimilation of sunflower and canola plants which in turn increased this value. These results conform with those reported by Radwan et al. (2014).

       The lowest values of seed yield of sunflower and canola crops were obtained with control and sugar beet waste addition, respectively. This result concluded that the use of sugar beet waste residues led to decreased values of seed yield of sunflower and canola crops in calcareous sandy loam soil. These results were confirmed by Shindo and Nishio (2005). Powlson and Olk (2000) found that the nutrients supplied through soil organic matter mineralization can lead to a decrease in the inorganic fertilizer requirements of crops. There is still a strong need for placing buried residue of sugar beet waste under long-term experiments, where adding sugar beet waste residues to the soil ensures the sustainability of soil fertility with an increase in productivity. Several studies have shown modest improvements in soil organic matter and soil physical properties following medium to long-term straw incorporation (i.e. >8-10 years), whereas there was little evidence of short-term impacts on soil quality, workability, or yield (HGCA. 2014). Generally, the effects of the interaction between tillage methods use of soil organic amendments sources 75 with compost addition and its effect on increasing seed yield and Oil % of sunflower and canola were positive and significant in the calcareous sandy loam soil.

 

 

 

 

Table (10). Effect of different treatments on seed yield (Mg ha-1) and oil (%) of sunflower and canola crops in  

                   calcareous soil.     

Treatments

(B)

Seed yield of sunflower (Mg ha-1)

Seed yield of canola (Mg ha-1)

Tillage (A)

Mean

(B)

Tillage (A)

Mean

(B)

Surface

Deep

Surface

Deep

Cont.

2.887e

3.910c

3.398c

1.673f

1.857e

1.765d

SBW

3.257de

4.417b

3.837b

1.947e

2.217cd

2.082c

Comp. + SBW

3.480cd

4.957a

4.218a

2.123d

2.283c

2.203b

Comp.

3.657cd

5.190a

4.423a

2.470b

2.840a

2.655a

Mean (A)

3.320b

4.618a

 

2.053b

2.299a

 

LSD 5 %

A=0.016     B=0.338   A*B=0.479

A=0.240    B=0.100   A*B=0.142

 

Oil (%) on seed yield of sunflower

Oil % on seed yield of canola

Cont.

43.10g

44.10e

43.60d

44.77e

45.10d

44.93d

SBW

44.00f

45.00b

44.50c

45.60c

45.80bc

45.70c

Comp. + SBW

44.50d

45.00b

44.75b

45.87b

46.00b

45.93b

Comp.

44.70c

45.10a

44.90a

46.03b

46.70a

46.37a

Mean (A)

44.08b

44.80a

 

45.57a

45.90a

 

LSD 5 %

A=0.0016   B=0.0018   A*B=0.0025

A=NS   B=0.174   A*B=0.246

Cont.: control; (S.B.W.): sugar beet waste; Comp.: compost

 

 

  1. Economic evaluation

Data in Table (11a&b) show profitability calculations for applying S.B.W as organic material versus mixed compost with sugar-beat waste and compost alone as treatments under this research. Input cost, outputs, net income, and investment ratio for the tested treatments

 

are presented in the same tables for both sunflower and canola crops. The obtained results revealed that the highest net income was ascertained in ascending order by applying compost, mixing S.B.W with compost, and compost alone for two crops.

 

 


Table (11a). Total input production items and output of the experiment.

Items

Treatments

Treatment unit

Unit price (L.E)

Total inputs

 

 

 

Ammonium nitrate 33.5%

142.8

kg(N)ha-1

10

Superphosphate 15.5%

107.1

kg(P2O5) ha-1  

16.67

Potassium sulphate 48%

57.1

kg(K2O) ha-1 

40

Organic materials

 

 

 

Sugar beat waste

14.28 Mg

Mg ha-1

100

Sugare beat waste + compost

(7.14 + 9.52 Mg)

Mg ha-1

600

Compost

19.04 Mg

Mg ha-1

500

sunflower seeds

9.5

kg ha -1

60

Canola seeds

9.5

kg ha -1

60

Land preparation

 

Per ha

1800

Pesticides

 

Per ha

1800

Other fixed costs of deep tillage

 

Per ha

2850

Outputs

 

 

 

Sunflower yield price 

 

 

28000

Canola yield price

 

 

28000

 

Table (11b). Economical assessment of tested variables for the experiment.

Sunflower

Tillage methods

Organic materials

Grain yield

Mg ha-1

Total output

LE ha-1

Total input

 LE ha-1

Net income

LE ha-1

I.R

Canola

Sunflower

Canola

Sunflower

Canola

Sunflower

Canola

Sunflower

Canola

S.T

SBW

3.257de

1.947e

91196

54516

16065

16065

75131

38451

5.7

3.4

Comp.+SBW

3.480cd

2.123d

97440

59444

20111

20111

77329

39333

4.9

2.9

Comp.

3.657cd

2.470b

102396

69160

24157

24157

78239

45003

4.2

2.9

D.T

SBW

4.417b

2.217cd

123676

62076

22848

22848

100828

39228

5.4

2.7

Comp.+SBW

4.957a

2.283c

138.796

63924

28322

28322

110474

35602

4.9

2.3

Comp.

5.190a

2.840a

145320

79520

30940

30940

114380

48580

4.6

2.5

               

 

The investment ratio values increased due to applied sugar beat waste by 16.32% and 35.7% than the investment ratio values by applying either mixed sugar beat waste and compost or compost alone treatments during the summer season for sunflower crop. Moreover, the same trend was noticed in the winter season for canola crop.

Thus, by applying sugar beat waste (SBW) was incremented by 17.2 than investment ratio values by applying either mixed SBW and compost or compost alone treatments for canola crop.  It was noticed that the difference in investment ratio values between the organic materials for both two crops may be due to the different prices of organic materials. As the sugar beat waste was considered as low economic value. As well as the same behavior was achieved between the two tillage methods. It took into consideration, that the investment ratio values obtained by applying deep tillage practice were lesser than by applying surface tillage practice for all treatments. This result was produced because of the high price of deep tillage practice.

It was obvious, from the previous data that the S.B.W mixed with compost or compost alone with the deep tillage practice has higher costs, lower the return, and decreased the economic efficiency.

 

 

 

 

CONCLUSION

Under the same experimental conditions, data indicated that the application of compost markedly improved sunflower and canola yields with both tillage methods. As well as, the elements components of both plants and the available nutrients of calcareous soil were ameliorated by applying the organic materials treatments in ascending order applying compost, mixing SBW with compost, and compost alone for the two crops and two tillage methods.

  However, the obtained results revealed that the highest net income was ascertained as monition above. However, investment ratio (economic efficiency) values increased due to applied sugar beat waste alone due to it was considered a low economic value by-product. More detailed research must done on a narrower range of applied sugar beat waste to formulate a better guideline to maintain sustainable agricultural production.

REFERENCES  
Abdallah, M., Dubousset, L., Meuriot, F., Etienne, P., Avice, J. C. & Ourry, A. (2010). Effect of mineral sulphur availability on nitrogen and sulphur uptake and remobilization during the vegetative growth of Brassica napus L. Journal of Experimental Botany, 11, 3239–3253.
AbdElghany, S. H., H. M. Khalil, M. A. Esmaeil and A. A. Arafat (2018). Acid catalysis pre-treatment of some straw for enhancing biomass degradation and compost production. Middle East J. Agric. Res., 7(4).
Abou Hussien E. A., A. M. Elbaalawy and M. M. Hamad (2019). Chemical properties of compost in relation to calcareous soil properties and its productivity of wheat. Egyptian Journal of Soil Science.vol. 59,No.1,pp.85-97.
Abou Hussien, E.A., Nada, W.M. and Elgezery, M. Kh. (2017) Evaluation of efficiency of sulphur fertilizer in calcareous soil amended by compost. Menoufia J. SoilSci., 2, 59-72.
Azza R. Ahmed, Ismail A. O. A. and Helmi M.Y. (2022). Raising the Efficiency of calcareous sandy loam soil production by applying organic low economic value. Middle East J. Appl. Sci., 12(2): 125-134.
Baligar, V. C., N.K. Fageria and Z. L. He (2001). Nutrient use efficiency in plants. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 32(7-8): 921–950.
Ball-Coelho, B. R., Roy, R. C. and Swanton, C. J. (1998). Tillage alters corn root distribution in coarse-textured soil. Soil Tillage Res. 45: 237–249.
Brunner, P. H., and Wasmer, H. R. (1978). Methods of Analysis of Swage Sludge Solids Wastes and Compost. WHO international Reference Center for wastes Disposal. CH-8600 Dubendorf, Switzerland.
Cannell, R. Q. and Hawes, J. D. (1994). Trends in tillage practices in relation to sustainable crop production with special reference to temperate climates. Soil Tillage Res. 30: 245–282.
Chapman, H.D. and Pratt, P.F. (1961). Methods of analysis for soils, plants and waters. University of California, Los Angeles, 60-61, 150-179.
Deepa, M. and K. Govindarajan (2002). Effects of lignite humic acid on soil bacterial, fungal and actinomycetes population. In: National seminar on recent trends on the use of humic substances for sustainable agriculture, Annamalai University, Tamil Nadu.
ELemike,EE.,Uzoh, I.M., Onwndiwe, D.C., Babalolo,O.O.(2019). The role of nanotechnology in the fertilzication of plantnutients and improvementof crop production. Appl.9, 499.
El-Gamal, B.A.H. (2015). Effect of some soil amendments on soil conditions and plant growth. Ph. D. Thesis, Fac. of Agric., Menoufia Univ., Egypt.
Elgezery, M.Kh. (2016). Effect of organic additives on efficiency of sulphur fertilization. M. Sc. Thesis, Fac. of Agric., Menoufia Univ., Egypt.
El-Meselawe, A.E.S. (2014). Effect of Bio-organic Sd-ditives on Phosphate Solubilization in Soils. M. Sc. Thesis, Evaluation of Natural Resources and Planning for Their Development Department, Environmental Studies and Research Institute, Sadat City Univ., Egypt.
Elsherpiny, M. A., Baddour, A., & Kany, M. (2023). Effect of organic and bio fertilization and magnesium foliar application on soybean production. Egyptian Journal of Soil Science, 63(1), 127-141.
Faiyad, R.M, El-Azeiz, E.H. & Yousif, E.E (2023). Effect of Sulfur, Boron, Zinc and Iron on Canola under Salt Affected Soils. Egyptian Journal of Soil Science, 63(4).
FAO. (2018). AQUASTAT website.  Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.   http://www.fao.org/nr/water/aquastat/countries_re gions/ EGY/.
Franzluebbers, A. J. and Hons, F. M. (1996). Soil-profile distribution of primary and secondary plant-available nutrients under conventional and no-tillage. Soil Tillage Res. 39: 229–239.
Frøseth, R.B., Bakken, A.K., Bleken, M.A., Riley, H., Pommeresche, R., Thorup-Kristensen, K. and Hansen, S. (2014) Effects of green manure herbage management and its digestate from biogas production on barley yield, N recovery, soil structure and earthworm populations. Euro. J. Agron., 52, 90-102.
Hargrove, W. L. (1985). Influence of tillage on nutrient uptake and yield of corn. Agron. J. 77: 763–768.
HGCA. (2014). Straw incorporation review. Research Review 81. HGCA, London.
Jackson, M.L. (1958). Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall Inc., Englewood Chiffs, 213-214.
 
Jackson, M.L. (1973). Soil Chemical Analysis, Constable and Co. Ltd. Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi. pp. 10-114.
Khalil, H.M., (2016). Impact of applying different irrigation methods, rice straw residues and soil amendments on some soil characteristics and wheat productivity in sandy soil. Egypt . J. of Appl. Sci., 31(3):110-128.
Khan, S. ; M. A. Qureshi ; J. Singh and G. Praveen (1997). Influence of Ni (ii) and Cr (iii), Humic acid (HA) complexes on major nutrients (NPK) status of the soil. Indian J. Agric. Chem, 31: 1-5.
Khodae-Joghan, A.M., Gholamhoseını, A.A., Majid, F., Habıbzadeh, A., Sorooshzadeh, A., Ghalavand, A. (2018). Response of sunflower to organic and chemical fertilizers in different drought stress conditions. Acta Agric. Slov. 111, 271–284.
Lindsay, W.L. and Norvell, W.A. (1978). Development of a DTPA Soil Test for Zinc, Iron, Manganese, and Copper. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 42, 421-428.
Modaihsh, A. S. ; A. A. Taha and M. O. Mahjoub (2005). Impact of some compost on wheat plant grown in calcareous soils. J. Agric. Sci. Mansoura Univ., 30: 8551-8559.
 Mohamed A. E. Soliman1, Mohamed A. El-Sherpiny2 and Shimaa M. Elmahdy (2024) Maximizing canola productivity as a promising oil crop in the Egyptian Agricultural Strategy: A Focus on organic and beneficial elements ertilization  Egypt. J. Soil Sci. Vol. 64, No. 2, pp: 397 – 409.
Mohamed, A.I., Ali, O.M. and Matloub, M.A. (2007). Effect of soil amendments on some physical and chemical properties of some soil of Egypt under saline irrigation water. African Crop Sci. Conf. Proc., 8, 1571-1578.
MSTAT-C., (1990). Micro Computer Statistical Program for Experimental Design and Analysis. Russell Freed (Ed.), MSTAT/Michigan State University, East Lansing MI.
Page, A.L., R. H. Miller and D. R. Keeny (1982). Methods of soil analysis. part 2. chemical and microbiological properties. second edition, madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Powlson, D.S. and D.C. Olk (2000). Long-term soil organic matter dynamics. In Kirk GJD and Olk DC, (Eds). Proceedings of the workshop on carbon and nitrogen dynamics in flooded soils. IRRI, Los Banos, Philippines., 49-63. Radwan, F.I. ; M.A. Gomaa ; M.A.A. Naser and I..F. Mussa (2014). Response of some Wheat Varieties to Humic Acid, Mineral and Biofertilization on Productivity and Quality. Middle East Journal of Agriculture Research, 3 (3): 631-637.
Rashwan, B. R. (2024). Impact of cultivation methods and fertilization by EM (Effective microorganisms) and/or compost on Productivity and water use efficiency of
 
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Egyptian Journal of Soil Science, 64(1) -83-98.
Richards, L.A. (1954). Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils, U.S. Dept. Agri. Handbook, No. 60, pp. 160.
Rizk,  E. K.(2007). Irrigation scheduling and environmental stress coefficient of kidney bean under some irrigation systems in North Sinai. Egypt. J. of Appl. Sci., 22(11) 286-296.
 
Shaaban, S., and Nasr, M. (2018). Agricultural Wastes-To-Green Energy in Egypt. Adv. Biotech. Microbiol., 8, 555750.
Shindo, H. and T. Nishio (2005). Immobilization and remineralization of N following addition of wheat straw into soil: determination of gross N transformation rates by 15N- ammonium isotope dilution technique, Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 37 (3): 425–432.
Sommers, L.E., and Nelson, D.W. (1972). Determination of total phosphorus in soils: a rapid perchloric acid digestion procedure. Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Am., 36, 902-904.
Soon and Clayton (2002). Eight years of crop rotation and tillage effects on crop production and N fertilizer use. Can. J. Soil. Sci. Downloaded from cdnsciencepub.com 165.172.
Taher, M.; Javani, M.; Beyaz, R., and Yildiz, M. (2017). A new environmental friendly production method in sunflower for high seed and crude oil yields. Fresenius Environ. Bull., 26, 4004–4010.
Vanlauwe, B., J. Diels, N. Sanginga and R. Merckx, (2002). Integrated plant nutrient management in Sub-Saharan Africa: From concept to practice’. (CAB International: New York).
Walkley, A., and Black I.A.,(1934). An examination of the Degtjareff Method for Determining Soil Organic Matter, and a proposed Modification of the Chromic Acid Titration Method. Soil Science, 37(1): 29-38.