Salt Stress of Jeursalim Artichoke Plants in Relation to The Pre-soaking Tubers with Hydrogen Peroxide

Document Type : Research papers

Authors

1 Sabaheya Horticultural Research Station, Horticulture Research Institute, A.R.C., Egypt.

2 Soil Salinity Department; Soil, Water, and Environment Research Institute; A.R.C., Egypt.

Abstract

Abstract: Two main experiments were carried out during the growing seasons 2018 and 2019 on Jerusalem artichoke cv. Fuseau at the Soil Salinity Laboratory Research, Agricultural Research Center, Alexandria, Egypt. This investigation is being proposed to assess the advantages of H2O2-soaked tubers and salt stress exposure on growth, yield components, quality and tubers' elemental composition. Tubers were planted in cemented-butaminzed lysimeters (2*2*1m) in rows, 80 cm in wide and 2 m in length. The treatments were comprised of two variables in split-plot design with three replicates. Four levels of saline irrigation water were prepared by mixing the fresh tap and sea waters, to create salt concentrations of 500  (control), 2000, 3500 and 5000mg/L, then, were arranged in the main plots. Whereas, three levels of H2O2 – soaking tubers before planting (control, 100 and 200mM) were arranged in the sub plots.  The H2O2- treated tubers were seeded in the cemented lysimeters, in rows of 80cm in width, 2m in length. At the flowering growth stage, characteristics of vegetative growth   were registered and finally at the harvest stage, yield, yield components and quality as well as the elemental tubers composition, including N, P and K% were recorded. The results showed that increasing the salinity levels of irrigation water up to 5000 mg/L negatively affected most of the growth characteristics (plant height, plant fresh weight). It also led to a decrease in the yield of tubers (the number of tubers per plant - the average weight of a tuber (g) and the total yield / fad. (tons) . The results also showed that the increase in the salinity of irrigation water led to exhibited marked reductions in the tuber concentration content of elements N, P and K% as well as carbohydrate and inulin% during the two growing seasons. The data also revealed positive effects of 100mM H2O2 – soaked tubers on vegetative growth criteria and yield performance. Similar trend was achieved on carbohydrate, inulin tuber content and N% of tuber only in the first season of this study. The interaction study revealed that there are no marked significant variation appeared for the vegetative growth criteria during the respective seasons. The results detected on plant height and yield components indicated that growth performance was clearly manifested for the combined treatment of 100 mM H2O2-treated tubers and salinity exposure, defined from 500 up to 2000 mg/L. Similar trend was also registered on carbohydrate, inulin and only N% contents of tubers. In conclusion, it seems possibly, in particular under saline conditions, soaking the tuber in 100 mM H2O2 before planting for 2h would be essential to avoid the harmful effect of salt exposure and to achieve better records on yield component and quality and elemental composition content in tubers.

Keywords


Introduction

 

Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) is a non- traditional tuberous crop ,which is recently introduced to Egypt for high nutritional and medicinal values. The tuber flesh of this plant  is a  rich source for nutrients and polysaccharides, particularly, inulin; that contains considerable levels of  fructose sweetener that could be utilized for human-being without any side effects on blood sugar level (Seljåsen and Slimestad, 2007). Its protein has high food value due to the presence of almost all essential amino acids ( Rakhimov et al., 2003). Tubers are considred a suitable livestock feed (Seiler and Campbell, 2004). In the last decades Jerusalem artichoke has been concidered as a biomass crop for ethanol because it produces high levels of carbohydrates ( Denoroy, 1996).

 

Salinity is one of the most important environmental stress variables that affects the growth and productivity of different crops (Lopez et al., 2002). The negative impact of salinity is increasing dramatically in the arid and semi-arid regions of the world where the majority of developing countries are located (Khan et al., 1999). Salinity not only exerts differences between average productivity and potential productivity, but also induces a marked drop the yield from year to year. It directly affects plant growth through its interaction with metabolic rates and pathways in plants (Rahimi et al., 2012).

 

Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), produced naturally in plant cells under stress conditions, is characterized by high oxidative reactivity (Ogawa and Iwabuchi, 2001). Hydrogen peroxide is considered necessary for cell signaling, due to its important role in regulating oxidative stress (Rhee, 2006). Recently H2O2 has been regarded as a stress signaling molecule in regulating plant development and adaptation to abiotic and biotic stresses (Hung et al., 2005). Exogenous application of H2O2 at low concentrations (≤ 2.5 mM) had stimulatory effect on growth traits of plants, while the concentration up to 5 mM played an opposite role (Deng et al., 2012). Hydrogen peroxide is found to be involved in the acclimation and tolerance of plants grown under salt stress (Li et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2013). Therefore H2O2, at low concentrations, is considered one of the exogenous materials that used to induce the defense mechanisms in plant cells (Chen et al., 1993) and have  a central role in improving  plant  tolerance  to  environmental  stresses  such  as  salinity  (Azevedo Neto et al., 2005; Ashraf et al., 2013). Furthermore, H2O2 seems to be a “master hormone” that controls a variety of stress responses and plays a key role in primary plant metabolism (Ślesak et al., 2007).

 

This study was carried out to investigate the potential role of H2O2 to improve the performance of growth and productivity of Jerusalem artichoke plants under different salt stressed conditions.

 

Materials and methods

 

The present investigation was carried out during the two successive summer seasons on mid of April 2018 and 2019 at Soil Salinity Laboratory Research, Alexandria, Agricultural Research Center. Jerusalem artichoke tubers of Fuseau cv. were planted in cemented-butaminzed lysimeters (2*2*1m). Tuber seeds were planted in rows, 80 cm in wide, 2 m in length.

 

Four levels of saline irrigation water, namely, tap water as a control, 2000, 3500 and 5000mg/L, were used as a source of irrigation, keeping the soil moisture content near the field capacity (27.85%). The saline water was prepared by mixing tap water (0.68 dS/m) with sea water (46 dS/m) at certain ratios. The tuber seeds were partitioned in three parts, the first and second parts of tubers were soaked in liquid H2O2 solutions (100 and 200 mM) for 2h. before planting. The third part of tubers (soaked tubers in distilled water) was used as the control.

 

Before planting, the following fertilizers were added to the soil at rates of kg, 20 m3 organic manure /fed. plus 150 P2O5/fed.in the form of mono calcium phosphate, 15.5 % P2O5. Nitrogen fertilizer was added in the form of ammonium nitrate (33.5% N) at the rate of 300 kg ∕ fed. at three equal doses ; after 4, 8  and 12 weeks from planting date.  Potassium sulphate (48% K2O) was applied at rate of 90 kg ∕ fed. in two equal doses after 8 and 12 week from the planting date. All other recommended agro-managements such as disease pests and weed control were performed whenever they appeared to be necessary.

 

The physical and chemical analyses of the experimental soil are presented in Table (1) according to (Page et al., 1982).

 

Table )1(. Physical properties and chemical analyses of the experimental soil

 

 

Physical properties

year

 

Sand%

Silt%

Clay%

Texture

pH

EC

dS/m

CaCO3

%

O.M%

2018

 

38.5

21.0

40.5

Clay loam

7.87

1.69

2.32

2.15

2019

 

38.2

21.1

40.7

Clay loam

7.86

1.72

2.35

2.17

 

 

Soluble cations (meq/L)

Soluble anions (meq/L)

Available nutrients mg/kg

year

 

Ca++

Mg++

Na+

K+

CO3=

HCO3-

Cl-

SO4=

N

P

K

2018

 

5.48

4.66

9.88

0.23

--

8.46

3.67

8.12

80.0

17.9

38.2

2019

 

5.51

4.68

9.65

0.25

--

8.41

3.76

7.94

86.4

18.2

39.1

                                     

  

Vegetative characteristics were measured and recorded at the initial stage of flowering (150 days after planting). A random sample of three plants from each experimental plot was taken to estimate plant height (cm), number of main stems and plant fresh weight (kg).

 

At the harvest time (180 days old plants), each individual plant in the all treatment lysimeters was removed to measure the number of tubers, average tuber fresh weight (g)  and total tubers' yield / feddan(ton) .

 

Random samples of ten fresh tubers per treatment were used to determine their dry matter percentage, at 70 °C. Inulin content was determined in tubers according to the method of Winton and Winton (1958). Total carbohydrate were determined colorimetrically as in terms of gram of glucose/100g dry weight of tubers roots according the methods described by James (1995). In the digested dry matter of tubers nitrogen was determined according to the methods described by Pregl (1945) using micro-Kjeldahl apparatus. Meanwhile, phosphorus was determined colorimetrically following Murphy and Riley (1962). Potassium was determined against a standard using air propane flame photometer following Chapman and Pratt (1961). The concentration of N, P and K were expressed as percentage.

 

The experimental design used was a split-plot design with three replicates, where the four levels of saline irrigation water, namely, tap water as a control, 2000, 3500 and 5000 mg/L were arranged in the main plots, whereas, tuber seeds was soaked with hydrogen peroxide (0,100 and 200 mM) were arranged in the sub plots. Each sub plot contained 2 rows. Collected data from the experiments were statistically analyzed, using the analysis of variance method. Comparisons among the means of different treatments were assessed, using least significant differences (L.S.D) test procedure at p ≤ 0.05 level of probability, as illustrated by Snedecor and Cochran (1980) using Co-Stat software program.

 

Results and Discussions

  1. Mean performances of vegetative growth parameters of Jerusalem artichoke crop
  • The main effect of irrigation water salinity concentrations

The results given in Table 2 showed significant effects at p ≤ 0.05 on plant height and foliage fresh weight/plant characters during the two seasons. Evidently, increasing irrigation water salinity concentration from 500 mg/L up to 5000 mg/L negatively affected plant height and foliage fresh weight/plant characters during the two seasons of this study. Unlike, the number of stems per plant was not significantly affected under the salt-stressed conditions at p0.05. Plant growth, as revealed from the data of plant height and foliage fresh were more superior in the control treatment. As the salinity of irrigation increased up to 5000 mg/L, adversable effects were clearly manifested. These results falls in line with the data reported by Mahmoud (2012) on potato plants. The reduction in plant growth under salinity stress conditions is consistent with the fact that salinity induces accumulation of certain ions and deficiency of the others and lowers the external water potential in the cell (Salem et al., 2017). Furthermore, the reduction in plant growing may be due to the interruption in metabolic activities affected by the decrease of water absorption and disturbance in water balance (Fahad et al., 2015).

 

  • The main effect of  soaked tubers in H2O2 concentration

The results of Table (2) showed that most of the studied vegetative characters were significantly affected p ≤ 0.05 with soaking tubers in H2O2 concentration treatments, except for No. of stems / plant. However, increasing H2O2 concentration exerted a significant positive effect on both plant height and foliage fresh weight/plant (g) traits during the two seasons. In this respect the highest mean values for plant height (cm) and fresh foliage weight/plant (g) were scored when the tubers soaked in 100mM H2O2 treatment, followed by with the soaking treatment of 200mM H2O2 treatment. In contrast, the lowest values were clearly noted in the control treatment. The results of Attia et al. (2017) showed that H2O2 priming can induce plants by modulating physiological and metabolic processes such as photosynthesis, proline accumulation detoxification, and that this ultimately leads to better growth and development.

 

  • The effect of tested interaction

The 2-way interaction of saline irrigation and  H2O2 - soaked tubers (table 2) imposed significant effects on growth traits at p ≤ 0.05. In general, soaking tubers with H2O2 concentration treatment gave the best results for the characteristics of plant height at any given level of salt stress treatment. As mentioned earlier, the characteristic of foliage fresh weight (g) and No. of stems /plant was not affected by the two independent variables, this trait was also not affected by the interaction between these two variables (Table, 2). A number of studies on plants have demonstrated that the pre-treatment with an appropriate level of H2O2 can enhance abiotic stress tolerance through the modulation of multiple physiological processes, such as photosynthesis, and by modulating multiple stress-responsive pathways (Hossain and Fujita 2013; Wang et al., 2014).

  1. Yield and yield components of Jerusalem artichoke crop

a- The main effect of irrigation water salinity concentrations

The documented results in Table 3 revealed clearly that total tuber yield and the corresponding its components e. i., number and weight of tuber /plant, average tuber weight as well as total yield/fed. were significantly affected (p ≤ 0.05) by irrigations water salinity concentrations during the two seasons of the growth. In this respect, highest records in tubers yield/fed. and their related characters that include i.e., average tuber weight, number of tubers/plant  and tubers weight yield/plant were clearly manifested in non-salt-stressed plants (control, 500 mg/L). With increasing the salinity levels of irrigation water, remarkable decrements on yield criteria were gradually noted, being the least at 5000 mg/L. As far as the total yield and its components are closely correlated with the vigorous of the vegetative growth. Therefore the reduction of the total yield and its components can be attributed to the fact that the vegetative characters were negatively affected by the high salinity of irrigation water (Table, 2). These results are in agreement with those reported by Elkhatib et al. (2004), Mahmoud (2012), Al-Hamdany and Mohammed (2014), Arafa and El-Howeity (2017) on potato. Abu-Muriefah (2015) attributed these results to changes in osmotic capacity due to reduction of water content in addition to the specific toxic effects resulting from the accumulation of sodium and chloride ions as observed in many plants. It was observed that salinity gradually reduced the size and number of marketable tubers per plant. In this respect, Ghosh et al. (2001) attributed the yield decrement in salt-stressed plants to the reduction of the tuber number per plant. It should be emphasized that the drop in yield, associated with salt- stress could be interpred to the nutritional imbalance, which consequently caused the inactivation of enzymes such as nitrate reductase (NR).

 

Table (2). Mean values of vegetative growth indices of Jerusalem      artichoke plants during 2018 and 2019 seasons

 

Treatments

Vegetative growth characters / plant

2018

2019

water salinity levels

(ppm)

H2O2

Soaking

levels

(mM)

Plant height (cm)

No. of main stem/

plant

Plant

fresh

weight

(kg)

Plant height (cm)

No. of main stem/

plant

Plant

fresh

weight

(kg)

control

control

186.23a

9.26a

5.63a

188.31b

9.54a

5.26a

100

188.91a

9.84a

6.12a

196.43a

9.96a

5.86a

200

165.32c

9.23a

6.84a

178.10c

9.45a

6.41a

2000

Control

175.63b

8.56a

4.51a

189.36b

8.12a

5.45a

100

187.25a

8.32a

5.65a

197.21a

9.45a

5.28a

200

186.96a

9.54a

5.85a

179.36c

9.89a

5.63a

3500

control

169.25b

8.56a

4.56a

174.23c

8.52a

4.51a

100

174.56b

8.23a

4.78a

163.25e

8.96a

4.56a

200

163.23c

8.21a

4.96a

173.21d

8.42a

5.12a

5000

control

121.23f

7.23a

4.52a

145.63f

7.41a

4.02a

100

146.23d

7.98a

4.48a

149.23e

7.76a

4.22a

200

132.45e

7.12a

4.65a

146.12f

7.89a

4.45a

Main effect of saline irrigation water (A)

Control

 

210.51a

9.23a

5.894a

243.52a

10.23a

6.175a

2000 mg/L

 

200.43b

8.12a

5.190b

214.56b

10.25a

5.635b

3500 mg/L

 

196.21c

8.25a

4.653c

195.34c

10.03a

5.056c

5000 mg/L

 

185.63d

7.36a

4.285d

186.23d

9.87a

4.229d

Main effect of soaked tuber in H2O2 (B)

control

 

223.15c

8.56a

4.82c

186.21c

7.56a

4.63b

100 mM

 

246.45a

9.51a

5.86a

238.23a

8.23a

5.32a

200 mM

 

238.23b

9.26a

5.19b

206.58b

8.36a

4.89b

* Significant at 0.05 level of probability.

 

  1. The main effect of soaked tubers in H2O2 concentration

The results of Table (3) appeared that tubers yield/plant were significantly affected (p ≤ 0.05) by soaking tubers in H2O2 solutions during the two growing seasons. Regarding to the number of tubers/plant and total yield per feddan, the data showed that both traits were significantly decreased by soaking tubers in H2O2 with 100mM, only in 2019. The result obtained on the fresh tubers did not appear any significant variations along the H2O2-soaking treatments during both seasons. Similar results were recorded on wheat (Hameed et al., 2004), indicating that exogenous application of H2O2 provided more vigorous root system in wheat. H2O2 applied in low doses can increase roots weight and length (Narimanov and Korystov, 1997). Recently, has been reported that intensive root growth acted well for higher nitrogen uptake in wheat (Liao et al., 2004). More vigorous root grown will cause higher nitrogen uptake, creating better growth development of wheat plant. Niu and Liao (2016) showed that H2O2 mediates various developmental and physiological processes in plants. Also, the change of H2O2 level may impact metabolic and antioxidant enzyme activity related to plant growth and development (Barba-Espín et al., 2014).

 

Table (3). The average values of Jerusalem artichoke tuber yield and its     component characters as affected with water salinity concentrations, soaked tubers in H2O2 treatments and their interaction during the two study seasons

 

Treatments

2018

2019

water salinity levels

(ppm)

H2O2

Soaking

levels

(mM)

No. of

tubers/

plant

Tuber fresh

weight

(g)

Total

yield

(ton/fed.)

 

No. of

tubers/

plant

Average

tuber fresh

weight

(g)

Total

Yield

(ton/fed.)

 

control

control

54.26b

39.26c

13.26b

52.63b

49.54a

14.54a

100

59.32a

49.84a

14.54a

58.12a

50.96a

14.96a

200

48.25cd

39.23c

12.56c

51.56b

39.45c

12.45a

2000

Control

44.23e

48.56a

12.69c

50.12b

48.12a

13.56a

100

50.23c

48.32a

14.25a

53.60b

49.45a

14.87a

200

47.84d

39.54c

13.25b

45.23e

40.89a

12.41a

3500

control

52.36bc

38.56c

12.74c

35.21f

38.52c

12.54a

100

54.63b

48.23a

13.56b

46.23d

46.96b

12.89a

200

47.21d

38.21c

11.45d

33.25g

38.42a

11.23a

5000

control

41.25e

37.23c

11.35d

33.85g

37.41c

10.52a

100

36.98f

42.98b

12.36c

42.03e

39.76c

10.96a

200

32.58g

36.12d

10.25e

36.25f

37.89c

10.12a

Main effect of saline irrigation water (A)

Control

 

76.41a

48.21a

12.96a

70.12a

42.36a

12.36a

2000 mg/L

 

65.45b

41.52b

12.63a

63.45b

38.14b

12.12a

3500 mg/L

 

61.56c

36.84c

11.25a

54.32c

32.69c

11.52b

5000 mg/L

 

43.85d

30.58d

10.23b

46.23d

30.52d

10.56b

Main effect of soaked tuber in H2O2 (B)

control

 

55.02a

45.13a

13.24a

48.45a

47.56a

14.25a

100 mM

 

58.41a

49.51a

13.85a

50.69a

48.23a

14.85a

200 mM

 

48.65a

39.26a

11.87a

39.69b

38.36a

12.55b

* Significant at 0.05 level of probability.

 

  1. The interaction effect of combined treatment

The interaction effect of two combined treatments exerted significant trend at p ≤ 0.05 on the number of tubers/plant and average tuber fresh weight traits during the two study seasons (Table, 3). In 2018, optimal results were realized when the tubers were soaked in 100mM H2O2 and irrigated with 500mg/L saline water, followed by water salinity concentrations of 2000 and 3500 mg/L, respectively. While the lowest positive results were at water salinity level of 5000 mg/L. As for the first season the significantly highest mean values for total yield / fed. were recorded with the saline irrigation , namely, 500 mg/L and 2000 mg/L , when the tubers were soaked in 100 mM H2O2 solution.

 

Table (4). The average values of Jerusalem artichoke tubers′ quality traits as affected with water salinity concentrations, soaked tubers in H2O2 treatments and their interaction treatments during the two study seasons

                   

Treatments

2018

2019

 

water salinity levels

(mg/L)

H2O2-

Soaking

Levels (mM)

Total carbohydrates

(%)

 

Inulin

( %)

 

Tubers dry matter

(%)

Total carbohydrates (%)

Inulin (%)

 

Tubers dry matter

(%)

 

control

control

55.62a

22.54a

23.45a

58.42a

23.45a

23.54a

100

57.91a

23.41a

24.15a

61.23a

23.65a

24.32a

200

51.32b

21.45a

24.28a

53.21b

22.10a

23.15a

2000

control

50.63b

21.56a

22.84a

52.36b

22.85a

22.45a

100

58.16a

22.74a

24.85a

59.81a

23.41a

24.78a

200

50.28b

21.36a

22.36a

57.22ab

21.35a

21.41a

3500

control

51.08b

21.52a

22.51a

50.21b

21.74a

22.54a

100

52.41b

20.98a

22.87a

53.84b

21.53a

23.12a

200

49.85c

20.74a

21.46a

47.63cd

20.71a

21.54a

5000

control

46.23d

21.56a

21.65a

49.36c

20.36a

21.54a

100

48.53c

21.05a

21.85a

48.53c

20.17a

21.23a

200

47.75c

19.45a

20.14a

47.23cd

20.67a

20.09a

Main effect of irrigation water salinity concentrations (A)

control

 

55.89a

21.36a

22.45a

57.96a

22.23a

22.41a

2000 mg/L

 

52.96b

20.54b

21.36b

51.85b

21.25b

21.64b

3500 mg/L

 

48.21c

20.04c

20.54c

49.68c

20.03c

20.45c

5000 mg/L

 

45.86d

19.36d

19.78d

44.83d

18.87d

19.02d

Main effect of soaked tuber in H2O2 (B)

control

 

59.21b

23.56a

20.74a

58.21a

22.56a

20.63a

100 mM

 

63.45a

23.51a

21.56a

61.23a

22.23a

20.32a

200 mM

 

54.28c

21.26b

19.54a

53.58a

21.36a

19.89a

                     

* Significant at 0.05 level of probability.

 

 

Table (5). The averages of tubers′ mineral element contents as affected with water salinity concentrations, soaked tubers in H2O2 treatments and their interaction treatments during the two study seasons

 

Treatments

2018

2019

water salinity levels

(mg/L)

H2O2-

Soaking

levels (mM)

N

(%)

 

P

(%)

 

K

(%)

N

(%)

P

(%)

K

(%)

control

control

1.521a

0.231a

4.325a

1.425a

0.24a

4.263ab

100

1.598a

0.245a

4.155a

1.486a

0.243a

4.562a

200

1.536a

0.236a

4.361a

1.205cd

0.251a

3.814bc

2000

Control

1.421ab

0.243a

4.184a

1.496a

0.232a

4.204b

100

1.325b

0.250a

4.815a

1.523a

0.241a

4.851a

200

1.254c

0.232a

4.264a

1.352b

0.223a

3.296d

3500

control

1.342b

0.214a

3.514a

1.265c

0.214a

3.025d

100

1.305b

0.216a

3.874a

1.312b

0.232a

2.654e

200

1.145d

0.205a

3.026a

1.156d

0.182a

2.346f

5000

control

0.954e

0.168a

3.105a

0.896e

0.174a

2.410ef

100

0.854ef

0.184a

2.815a

0.892e

0.179a

2.169f

200

0.836e

0.173a

2.148a

0.853e

0.165a

2.135f

Main effect of irrigation water salinity concentrations (A)

control

 

1.723a

0.267a

4.233a

1.625a

0.213a

4.436a

2000  mg/L

 

1.524b

0.242a

3.725b

1.478b

0.205b

3.687b

3500  mg/L

 

1.356c

0.154b

3.286c

1.306c

0.194c

3.045c

5000  mg/L

 

0.949d

0.125b

2.842d

1.021d

0.173d

2.874d

Main effect of soaked tuber in H2O2 (B)

control

 

1.478a

0.189a

3.654a

1.529a

0.232a

3.512a

100 mM

 

1.458a

0.221a

3.436a

1.635a

0.214a

3.457a

200 mM

 

1.280b

0.170a

3.412a

1.486a

0.192a

3.419a

* Significant at 0.05 level of probability.

 

  1. The performances of tubers′ quality and elemental composition
  2. The main effect of saline irrigation water

The properties of tuber quality traits and the elemental composition of Jerusalem artichoke tubers are given in Tables 4 and 5. As for the tested water salinity irrigation concentrations, the results revealed that the tested tubers′ quality traits  expressed as total carbohydrate , inulin  and dry matter percentages and tuber elemental composition, including N, P and K content were significantly affected (p ≤ 0.05) with  increasing saline irrigation water during the two seasons. The results clearly showed a gradual decline in the mean values of the quality traits and tubers' elemental contents of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium elements with increasing the level up to 3500 mg/L and severely dropped at the highest salinity exposure. Total dry matter production significantly decreased with increasing water salinity level. In contrast, Ghosh et al. (2001) illustrated that tuber N content increased by salt stress presumably due to the decrease in the carbohydrate content in the tubers. The decreases in K+ could be attributed to the antagonism of Na+ and K+ at uptake positions in the roots, the effect of Na+ on K+ transport into the xylem or the inhibition of uptake processes (Hu and Schmldhlter, 2005). In a saline environment, plants take up an excessive amount of sodium at the expense of K+ and Ghosh et al. (2001) illustrated that the decrease of dry matter production as a result of increasing salinity was relatively more pronounced in tubers than in the other parts of the plant. This result is consistent with El-Hedek (2013), who found a decrease in wheat plant phosphorus content with increased salt concentration in the soil.

 

b- The main effect of H2O2-soaked tubers

The results given in Table 5 indicated that except N% in 2018 & 2019 as well as K% in, 2019, no marked variations were detected at p ≤ 0.05. Regarding to the tubers quality, including; carbohydrate and inulin %, the results reported in Table 4 indicated that, only in 2018, significant differences were appeared between the 2 concentration levels of H2O2 100 and 200 mM soaked-treated tubers. The results in Table 4 clarified that although the differences in the dry yield of tubers and P and K% between H2O2 –treated tubers along the all exposed salinity treatment did not impose any significant variations at p ≤ 0.05 different results were reported by Samah et al. (2012), indicating that the highest percentage of tubers dry matter was possessed when potato plants were sprayed with 40mM hydrogen peroxide.

 

  • The effect of combined Treatments

The 2-way interaction of the combined treatment effects exhibited significant variations on total carbohydrate and nitrogen tubers content affected during the two growing seasons (Tables 4 and 5). Tubers potassium content was significantly affected only during the second season. The remaining estimated element P, inulin and dry matter percentage in tubers were not significantly affected by this interaction during the two growing seasons. In general, soaked tubers with H2O2 (100mM) generally gave the best values for the estimated elements and tubers′ quality traits, even if this increase was not significant in some cases.

 

Generally, it could be concluded that soaked Jerusalem artichoke tubers on concentration of 100mM hydrogen peroxide before   planting was promising to achieve better results and was effective to alleviate the adverse effects of irrigation water salinity on the vegetative growth criteria ad inducing progressive in increases in total tubers yield per feddan, and tubers′ quality characteristics.

 

 

 

References
Abu-Muriefah, S. S. (2015). Effect of sitosterol on growth, metabolism and protein pattern of pepper (Capsicum annuum L) plants grown under salt stress conditions. Int. J. Agric. Sci., 8(2): 94- 106.
Al-Hamdany, S.A. and M.S. Mohammed )2014(. Effect of salinity of irrigation water and spraying amino acids (proline, arginine) in the growth and holds potato (Solanum tuberosum L). Diyala Agric. Sci., 6(2): 154-163. (In Arabic)
Arafa, M.M. and M.A. El-howeity )2017(. Response of some potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) cultivars to different salinity levels of irrigation water under sandy soil. Middle East J. Agric. Res., 6(1): 57-66.
Ashraf, M.A.; M. Rasool; Q. Ali; M.Z. Haider; A. Noman and M. Azeem (2013). Salt-induced perturbation in growth, physiological attributes, activities of antioxidant enzymes and organic solutes in mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) cultivars differing in salinity tolerance. Archives Agron. Soil Sci., 59(12): 1695-1712.
Attia, G.M. ; A.H. Mahmoud and A. A. El-Araby (2017). Response of wheat plants to seed pre- soaking in hydrogen peroxide solution under salt stress conditions. Alex. Sci. Exch. J., 38(2): 314-325.
Azevedo Neto, A.D.; J.T. Prisco; J. Eneas-Filho; J.V.R. Medeiros and E. Gomes-Filho (2005). Hydrogen peroxide pretreatment induces stress acclimation in maize plants. J. Plant Physiol., 162: 1114–1122.
Barba-Espín G., P. Diaz-Vivancos, D. Job, M. Belghazi, C. Job and J.A. Hernández )2014(. Understanding the role of H2O2 during pea seed germination: a combined proteomic and hormone profiling approach. Plant Cell Environ., 34 :1907–1919.
Chapman, H. D. and P.F. Pratt (1961). Methods of Analysis for Soil, Plant and Water. University of California, Division of Agricultural Sciences. Riverside California.
Chen, Z.; H. Silva and D.F. Klessing (1993). Active oxygen species in the induction of plant systemic acquired resistance by salicylic acid. Sci., 262: 1883–1886.
Elkhatib, H.A., E.A. Elkhatib, A.M. Khalf-Allah and A.M. El-Sharkawy, )2004(. Salt tolerance of four potato cultivars. J. Pl. Nutr. 27(9):1575–1583.
El-Hedek, K.S. )2013(. Effect of foliar applications of salicylic acid and potassium silicate on tolerance of wheat plants to soil salinity. J. Soil Sci. Agric. Eng., Mansoura Univ., 4(3): 335 – 357.
Deng, X.P.; Y.J. Cheng; X.B. Wu; S.S. Kwak; W. Chen and A.E. Eneji (2012). Exogenous hydrogen peroxide positively influences root growth and exogenous hydrogen peroxide positively influences root growth and metabolism in leaves of sweet potato seedlings. Aust. J. Crop Sci., 6: 1572-1578.
Dnoroy, P. )1996(. The crop physiology of Helianthus tuberoses L.: a model oriented view. Biomass Bioenergy., 11(1):11-32.
Fahad, S., S. Hussain, A. Matloob, F. A. Khan, A. Khaliq, S. Saud and M. Faiq )2015(. Phytohormones and plant responses to salinity stress: a review. Pl. Grow. Regul., 75: 391-404.
Ghosh, S.C., K. Asanuma, A. Kusutani and M. Toyota )2001(. Effect of salt stress on some chemical components and yield of potato. Soil Sci. Pl. Nutr., 47(3): 467-475.
Hameed, A., S. Farooq, N. Iqbal and R. Arshad )2004(. Influence of Exogenous Application of Hydrogen Peroxide on Root and Seedling Growth on Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Intr. J. Agric. And Biol., 6(2): 1-11.
Hossain, M.A., and M. Fujita ) 2013(. Hydrogen peroxide priming stimulates drought tolerance in mustard (Brassica juncea L.). Plant Gene Trait., 4:109–123.
Hu,Y. and U. Schmldhalter )2005(. Drought and salinity: A comparison of their effects on mineral nutrition of plants. J. Pl. Nutr. Soil Sci., 168: 541-549.
Hung, S.H.; C.W. Yu and C.H. Lin (2005). Hydrogen peroxide functions as a stress     signal in plants. Bot. Bull. Acad. Sin., 46: 1–10.
James, C.S. (1995). Analytical Chemistry of Foods. Blokie Academic & Professional, London.
Khan, M.J.¸ H. Rashid, R. Ali )1999(. Inter-varietal variability in wheat grown under saline conditions. Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 2: 693-696.
Liao, M. ; I. R.P. Fillery and J. A. Palta (2004). Early vigorous growth is a major factor influencing nitrogen uptake in wheat. Functional plant Biology, 31(2):121-129.
Li, J.T., Z.B. Qui, X.W. Zhang and L.S. Wang )2011(. Exogenous hydrogen peroxide can enhance tolerance of wheat seedlings to salt stress. Acta Physiol. Plant., 33:835-842.
Lopez, C.M.L., H. Takahashi, S. Yamazaki )2002(. Plant-water relations of kidney bean plants treated with NaCl and foliar applied glycinebetaine. J. Agron. Crop Sci., 188: 73-80.
Mahmoud, M.M.S.(2012(. Differential response of some potato varieties to irrigation with saline water. Ann. Agric. Sci. Moshtohor, 50(3): 327-340.
Murphy, J. and J. P. Riley (1962). A modified single solution for the determination of phosphate in natuural waters. Anal. Chem. Acta., 27: 31- 36.
Narimanov, A.A. and Y.N. Korystov (1997). Low doses of ionizing radiation and hydrogen peroxide stimulate plant growth. Biologia (Bratislava), 52: 121–124.
Niu, L. and W. Liao (2016). Hydrogen Peroxide Signaling in Plant Development and Abiotic Responses: Crosstalk with Nitric Oxide and Calcium. Front Plant Sci., 7: 230.
Ogawa, K. and M. Iwabuchi (2001).  A  mechanism  for promoting  the  germination of  Zinnia  elegans seeds  by  hydrogen  peroxide.  Plant Cell  Physiol.,  42(3): 286–291
Page, A. L., R. H. Miller and D. R. Keeney )1982(. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2: Chem. and Microbiological Properties. Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, Wisconsin, U.S.A.
Pregl, E. (1945). Quantitative Organic Microanalysis. 4th Ed. J. Chundril, London.
Rahimi, R., A. Mohammakhani, V. Roohi and N. Armand (2012). Effects of salt stress and silicon nutrition on chlorophyll content, yield and yield components in fennel (Foeniculum vulgar Mill.). Int. J. Agri. Crop Sci., 4(21):1591-1595.
 Rakhimov, D.A. ,A. O. Arifkhodzhaev, L. G. Mezhlumyan, O. M. Yuldashev, U.A. Rozikova, N. Aikhodzhaeva, and M. M. Vakil (2003). Carbohydrates and proteins from Helianthus tuberosus. Chem . Nat. Comp., 39(3): 312-313.
Rhee, S.G. (2006). H2O2, a necessary evil for cell signaling. Science, 312:1882–1883.
Salem, H.M., Y. Abo-Setta, M.A. Aiad, H.A. Hussein and R.A. El-Awady (2017). Effect of potassium humate and potassium silicate on growth and productivity of wheat plants grown under saline conditions. J. Soil Sci. Agric. Eng., Mansoura Univ., 8 (11): 577 – 582.
Sameh, A.M. M., N.I. Abo-Elfadel and N.F.Agamy (2012). Role of hydrogen peroxide in improving potato tuber quality. Alex. Sci. Exch. J. 33(2):75-88.
Seiler, G. J. and I. G.Campell (2004). Genetic variability for mineral element concentrations of wild Jerusalem artichoke forage. Crop Sci., 44:289-292.
Ślesak, I.; M. Libik, B. Karpinska, S. Karpinski and Z. Miszalski (2007). The role of hydrogen peroxide in regulation of plant metabolism and cellular signalling in response to environmental stresses. Acta Biochemica Polonica, 54: 39– 50.
Seljåsen,R. and R.Slimestad (2007). Fructooligosaccharides and phenolic in flesh and peel of spring harvested Helianthus tuberoses. ISHS Acta Horticulture 744:1 International Symposium on Human Health Effects of Fruits and Vegatables. 
Snedecor, G.W. and W.G. Cochran (1980). Statistical Methods. 7th Ed., Iowa State Univ., Press, Ames., Iowa, USA.
 U.S. Salinity Laboratory Staff (1954). Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. U.S. Dep. Agri. Handbook 60.U.S. Gov. Printing Office, Washington, DC. 
Wang, X., C. Hou, J. Liu, W. He, W. Nan, H. Gong, and Y. Bi (2013). Hydrogen peroxide is involved in the regulation of rice (Oryza sativa L.) tolerance to salt stress. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 35: 891-900.
Wang,Y., J. Zhang, J. L. Li and X. R. Ma (2014). Exogenous hydrogen peroxide enhanced the thermo tolerance of Festuca arundinacea and Lolium perenne by increasing the antioxidative capacity. Acta Physiol. Plant, 36: 2915– 2924.
Winton, A.L. and K.B. Winton (1958).The analysis of foods. John Wiley and  Sons. Inc. London.pp.857.