Impact of irrigation Deficit, Soil Conditioner and Antitranspirant on Yield and Quality of Potato

Document Type : Research papers

Authors

1 Postgraduate student

2 Plant Production Dept., Faculty of Agriculture (Saba Basha)-Alexandria University

3 Soil and Agricultural Chemistry Dept., Faculty of Agriculture (Saba Basha)-Alexandria University

Abstract

This study was carried out in a private farm at El-Nobaria region, El-Beheira Governorate, Egypt, during the winter growing seasons of (2015 and 2016) to study the effect of irrigation deficit, (SAB) as  soil conditioner and (protone) as plant antitranspirant on tuber yield and quality of potato crop. The experiments were carried out in a split-split plot design with three replicates. Three irrigation levels (100, 75 and 50 % of reference evapotranspiration) were arranged in main plots, soil conditioner (control, 4 and 8 kg/fed) were arranged in subplots and plant antitranspirant (control, 0.25 and 0.50 L/fed.) were arranged in sub-subplots. The collected data were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the aid of STATISTIX 8 package and significant means separated using Least Significant Difference (LSD) at 5% probability level. The results indicated that the potato yield and its components,significantly increased with increasing water supply up to 100%, application of the soil conditioner at 8 kg/fed., andthe plant antitranspirant at 0.50 L/fed.comparedto other treatments during 2015 and 2016growing seasons. Irrigation at 100% level increased tuber yield by (23.08 and 22.83%) and marketable tuber (3.68 and 3.7%) for both seasons, respectively. Application of soil conditioners increased the tuber yield by (19.21, 19.61%), and marketable tuber by (1.61 and 1.94%), for both seasons, respectively. In addition application of plant antitranspirant increases tuber yieldby 20.87 and19.61% and marketable tuber by about 1.70 and 1.88% for both seasons, respectively. All tuber characters such as (TSS, VC, total carbohydrates, total sugars, protein, N, P, K contents and protein content) increased significantly with irrigation level up to 100%, the soil conditioner(8 kg/fed.), and the antitranspirant (0.5 l/fed.) applications. Based on the present results,it could be recommended that irrigation of potato plants at 100% of ETo with application of soil conditioner (SAB) at 8 kg/fed., and spraying the plants with the antitranspirant (Protone) at rate of 0.5 l/fed. was the most efficient treatments for tuber yield and tuber quality of potato plants grown in loamy soil (El-Nobaria region).

Keywords


INTRODUCTION

Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) belongs to Solanaceae family. It is a popular vegetable crop, which ranked the fourth among the most important food crops for a human being after rice, wheat, and maize. AOAD (2014)reported that total cultivated area in Egypt was 381,000 fed., with a total production of 4265,000 ton/year. Karam et al.(2009)reported that potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) is one of the major crops contributing to the world’s food security. Potato is one of the most important field corps not only for its local consumption but also to its exportation to different countries around the world as described by Kandil et al.(2011). Abiotic stress factors, such as drought, have severe, adverse effects on potato growth and yield (Levy et al., 2013). In particular, a regular water supply is necessary to achieve a high quality of the yield (Ierna et al., 2011; Levy et al., 2013). In arid and semi-arid areas, early potato growing cycle often subjected to long periods of drought and its cultivation usually requires irrigation throughout the spring during the stage of tuber bulking and growth (Ierna et al., 2011).

 

 

Potato response to water deficit can be very different among cultivars (Hassanpanah, 2010), as a function of water stress occurrence period (Kashyap and Panda, 2003). Among growth stages, early development stage, as compared with tuber formation and flowering stages, has shown to be the most sensitive to water stress, hence the most responsive to irrigation.

 

The soil conditioners, which added to soil is another factor to improve the soil’s physical qualities, usually its fertility (ability to provide nutrition for plants) and sometimes its mechanics. Soil conditioners can be used to improve poor soils or to rebuild soils, which have damaged by improper soil management.  Several approaches have investigated to increase the water use efficiency and maintain the productivity of the sandy soils in Egypt. The combined application of soil conditioners and mineral fertilizerswas recognized as an appropriate means for increasing fertility in water depleted soils, particularly in arid regions(Vanlauwe et al., 2010).

 

Plant antitranspirants are chemical compounds whose role is to train plants by gradually hardening them to stress as a method of reducing the impact of drought. There are different types of antitranspirants: film forming which stops almost all transpiration; stomatal, which only affects the stomata and reflecting materials(Nasraui, 1993).Reducing transpiration can play a useful role in this respect by preventing the excessive loss of water to the atmosphere via stomata (Khalil, 2006).The plant antitranspirants are materials involved in increasing drought resistance by tending to cause xeromorphy and/or stabilizing cell structure (Oudaet al.2007).

 

In this context, Bittelli et al. (2001) reported that occasional or episodic drought events might counteracted withantitranspirants. These compounds including  both film-forming and stomata closing compounds are  able to increase the leaf resistance to water vapor loss thus improving plant water use to assimilate carbon and in turn, the production of biomass or yield (Tambussi and Bort, 2007). Another approach to reduce water loss due to transpiration is by increasing the reflection of sunlight from leaves, through reflectingantitranspirants type, thus limiting the water loss deputed to evaporative leaf cooling (Gaballah and Moursy, 2004).The main objective of this workis to investigate the effect of irrigation deficit, (SAB) as soil conditioner and Protone as plant antitranspirant on potato productivity and yield quality under drip irrigation system.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two field experiments conducted in a private farm at El-Nobaria region, El-Behaira Governorate, Egypt (30° 48¢ 17² N and 29° 59¢ 49² E), during the winter growing seasons of 2015 and 2016 to study the effects of irrigation deficit, SAB(Super Absorbent Polymer, polyacrylamide as soil conditioner) and protone (growth hormon, ABA as a vital role in regulation of opening and closing of stomata) asplant antitranspirant on the yield and quality of potato crop.

           

A surface soil sample (0-30cm) collected before planting to identify some physical and chemical properties of the experimental site according to Carter and Gregorich (2008)and the reported data listed in Table (1).

Table (1).Some physical and chemical properties of the experimental soil

                used in the present study

 

value

Parameter

 

Particle-size distribution (%)

42.42

Sand

36.56

Silt

21.02

Clay

Loam

Textural class

 

 

8.25

pH (1:2, water suspension)

0.59

EC(1:2, water extract), dS/m

2.04

OM (%)

24.65

CaCO3 (%)

 

Soluble cations (meq/l)

2.40

Ca2+

0.60

Mg2+

2.23

Na+

0.23

K+

 

Soluble anions (meq/l)

0.10

HCO3-

2.00

Cl-

3.36

SO42-

 

Available nutrients (mg/kg)

40.0

N

14.3

P

144.0

K

5.60

Fe

11.80

Mn

2.52

Zn

2.50

Cu

     

           

The cultivation is done in the 5thand 8thof January in both seasons. The seeds were planted as a whole at 0.25 m apart in the row, 25 m long and 0.6 m width. Each plot(45 m2) consisted of three rows. The treatments of the two experiments were as follows;three irrigation levels(100, 75, and 50%) of reference evapotranspiration (ET0), threesoil conditioner rates, SAP(control, 4 and 8 kg/fed.) and the antitranspirant rates, Protone 10% SL (control, 0.25 and 0.50 L/fed.)which applied during the two seasons of this investigation.

 

The sulfur powder was added at the rate of 100 kg/fed. at soil preparation. The following mineral fertilizers were added to the soil at preparation.Mono calcium phosphate (15.5%P2O5) at rate of 75 kg P2O5/fed., potassium sulfate (48% K2O) at the rate of 96 kg K2O/fed and nitrogen fertilizer (100 kg N/fed.)the form of ammonium nitrate (33.5% N) were added throughout the drip irrigation system. All of the other agricultural practices for potato productionwere followed as recommended in the area.  Harvest has done at 27thand 30thof April in both seasons, respectively.

Data recorded

  1. Yield and yield quality parameters
  • Average tuber weight (g) calculated by dividing tuber yield of each plot by its tuber's number.
  • Tuber yield (ton/fed.) was calculatedand attributed to the feddan
  • Tuber water content (%)determined by oven dry of tuber potato pieces at 70°C for 48 hrs.
  • Percentage of marketable tubers (%): all tubers characterized by its width 2 cm or more free from injuries, wounds, cracks or cuts, decays, insect infestations and secondary growth tubers are considered as acceptable for marketing.
  • Tuber dry matter (%)was carried out by weighing a specific weight of fresh tubers and then dried at 70 °C for 48h, then tuber dry matter was calculated as follows:

Tuber dry matter (%)= (Dry weight/ Fresh weight(X100

 

  1. B) Chemical composition

The N, P and K percentages were determined in the dry tubers. Their dry weights were determined after drying in a drying oven to a constant weight at 70oC for 72 hours according to Tandon (1995). After dryness, the dry samples were milled and stored for analysis. However, 0.5g of the tubers powder was wet-digested with H2SO4–H2O2 mixture according to Lowther (1980) and the following determinations were carried out in the digested solution:

  • Nitrogen content (N%): Total nitrogen was determined colorimetrically by Nessler`smethod (Chapman and Pratt, 1978). Nessler solution (35 IK/100 ml + 20g HgCl2 / 500 ml +120 g NaOH/250 ml). Reading was achieved using wavelength of 420 nm and total N was determined as the percentage as follows: % N = NH4 % x 0.78.
  • Phosphorus content (P%): Phosphorus determined by the Vanadomolybdate yellow method as given by Jackson (1973).The intensity of color developed to read in the spectrophotometer at 405nm.
  • Potassium content (K%):Potassium determined according to the method described by Jackson (1973)using Beckman Flame photometer.
  • Protein (%): Protein was determined by estimating the total nitrogen content in the tubers and multiplied by 6.25 to obtain the protein percentage according to AOAC(1990).
  • Total soluble solids of tuber (TSS %) determined in the tuber juice as the percentage by hand refractometer according to Chen and Mellenthin (1981).
  • Determination of reducing and non-reducing sugars percentages (%):A known mass (5 g) of fresh tuber was taken to determine the reducing and non-reducing sugars, using sulphuric acid, phenol (5%) and Nelson arsenate–molybdate, then they were colorimetrically determined according to the method of Malik and Singh (1980).
  • Determination of vitamin C (mg/100g): It determined by titration with 2, 6dichlorophenol-indo-phenol blue dye according to the methods of Jacobs (1951).
  • Total carbohydrates: Total carbohydrates were determined quantitatively, in tubers by Anthron method according to Mahadevan and Sridhar (1986) as follows:Extraction carried out by grinding dry matter in Mahadavan buffer (sodium citrate buffer, pH 6.8). The extracts were homogenized for 3 minutes and centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 15 min and the supernatant then was used to determine total carbohydrates.

 

 

Experimental design and statistical analysis

The experimental layout arranged as split-splitplot design, with three replicates. Three irrigation levels (100, 75 and 50% ofreference evapotranspiration, ET0) were assigned in the main plots, three soil conditioner rates (control, 4 and 8 kg/fed.)in the subplotsandthree antitranspirant rates (control, 0.25 and 0.50 L/fed.) in the sub-subplots.Collected data of the experiments were statistically, analyzed using the analysis of variance method(STATISTIX, 2003). Comparisons among the means of the different treatments were done, using the least significant differences (L.S.D) test procedure at p = 0.05 level of probability, as illustrated by Snedecor and Cochran (1980).

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

  1. Yield and yield components

The data recorded foryield and its components presented in Table (2). Theresults revealed that the gradually increasesnotes with increasing water supply up to 100% of EToduring the both seasons. Irrigation of potato plants with 100% of the reference evapotranspiration has the highest values of yield and its components. Treatment of 100% of ET0 had superiority in all characters such as, average tuber weight (67.46 g), tuber yield/plant(857.71 g), gross tubers yield (22.81ton/fed.), tuber dry matter (25.14%) tuber water content (74.86%), and marketable tuber (93.38 %) as average of bothgrowing seasons,respectively compared with other treatments. The increases of 100% of ETo were 12.58, 20.76, 20.75, -0.63, 0.21 and 3.71%, respectively over the 50% of ETo irrigation treatment.

 

On the other hand, it is clear from the obtained data in the same Table (2) that application of soil conditioner at rate of 8 kg/fed. significantly improved yield and its components of potato plants. Treatment of 8 kg/fed.soil conditioner recorded the maximum values of average tuber weight (66.45 g), tuber yield/plant(850.94g), gross tubers yield (22.64ton/fed.), tuber dry matter(25.02 %),tuber water content (74.98%), and marketable tuber (92.75 %), respectively, as average of  both seasons compared with control treatment, which gave the minimum values of these characters.

 

The data presented in Table (2) revealed thatapplication of plant antitranspirant up to 0.50 l/fed.significantly increased yield and its components of potato plants. Application of antitranspirant at rate of 0.50 l/fed., gave the highest mean values of yield and its components, such as average tuber weight (67.13g),tuber yield/plant (855.31 g), tubers gross yield (22.75ton/fed.), tuber dry matter (25.41%),tuber water content (74.59%) and marketable tuber (92.72%), respectivelyas average of two seasons compared with the control treatment,which gave the lowest mean values of these characters.

 

The interaction effects between irrigation levels and soil conditioner rates were highly significant with tuber yield and yield characters in both seasons.The other interaction effects are not significant for all yield characters except marketable tubers. The positive effect of 100% or 75% of the reference evapotranspiration on tubers yield and its components may attributed to the optimal or moderate soil moisture contents, which led to increase the nutrient availability and its uptake, as well as a reduction in soil salinity compared with low soil moisture. Higher values of soil moisture increased growth parameters, which reflected in higher rates of photosynthetic processes and carbohydrates production that increased final tubers yield. Whereas, the reduction in tuber yield due to water deficit may be attributed to the reduction in leaf area due to fewer and small leaves, and the increase in stomatal resistance for gas exchange, as well as the reduction in transpiration rate, which all resulted in a reduction in photosynthesis (Ghosh et al., 2000).The higher yield production under 100% of ETo may be due to the proper balance of moisture in plants, which creates favorable conditions for nutrients uptake, photosynthesis and metabolites translocation (Kar and Kumar, 2007).These results are in harmony consistent with Abdallah (1996), Khalel(2003) and Al-Aubiady(2005).

 

The high reduction in total yield obtained by deficit irrigation at 50 % of ETo may have been due to a direct effect of water stress on growth and initial tuber development or to indirect effects of water deficit on decreasing water and nutrients uptake, consequently decreased the vegetative growth and limiting the tuber yield. Such results are in harmony with those obtained by Bradford and Hsiao (1982), Abdel Nasser, (1991and 1993) and Abdallah (1996).Karamet al. (2014) stated that potato plants subjected toirrigation deficit at tuber bulking achieved marketable yield12% lower than that obtained with well-irrigated control. Whereas, irrigationdeficit at tuber ripening stage reduced tuber yield by 42% as compared withthe control. However, yield reduction compensated by an increase intuber dry matter in the deficit-irrigated treatments.

 

Potato is relatively sensitive to soil water stress, therefore tooptimize yield, the total available soil water should not depleted morethan 30 to 50% (Onder et al., 2005 and Pereira and Shock, 2006).These findings agreed with those of several studies in different environments, which indicate that the soil moisture deficit in the potato crop leads to a reduction in the total yield (Shock et al., 1992).

 

Many soil conditioners can used to improve soilproprieties, then improved growthand yield of vegetable crops (Croker et al., 2004). The application of soil conditioner increased the ability of soil to absorb large quantities ofwater, which led to more plant absorption of water, then improved the growth and yield of potato (Ding et al. 2009).The positive effect of soil conditioner on tuber yield may be due to:1) positive effect on soil water holding capacity (Iskanderet al. 2011),2) reducingthe leaching of plant nutrientsthrough its higher colloid content (Sitthaphanit et al., 2010),3) stimulating themeristematic activity for producing more tissues and organs (Marisa et al.,2009),and 4) vital contribution in several biochemical processes that are related to plant growth.

 

Abdel-Nasser and EL-Gamal (1996) concluded that FoliCote antitranspirant (wax emulsion) could be minimize the moisture losses from leaf surface when sprayed on the foliageproducing thin film that prevent the escape of water vapor from stomata.Theyexplained that increasingsweet potato root yield and characteristics byFoliCote applications primarily referred to the effect of this material on improving the plant water potential at the time when the growth of plant was more dependent on water status than on photosynthesis. The authors added that root formation stage also more related to plant water status, which related with available moisture in the root zone. Antitranspirants are chemical compounds which favors reduction in transpiration rate from plant leaves by reducing the size and number of stomata and gradually hardening them to stress (El Khawaga, 2013 and Ahmed et al., 2014). Application of antitranspirant may improve growthand physiological response in water and high temperaturestress in plants (Leskovar et al., 2008, 2011).Water stresses at a flowering stage decrease the yield component of cropand hence the foliar spray of antitranspirant improve the photosynthesis and reduces thetranspiration rate, which causes a better production incrops.Antitranspirants commonly used to reduce leaf waterloss. Its increase the relative water content of leaves at different irrigation levels (Misra et al., 2009). The efficacy of antitranspirant films dependson economic parameters and on the number of new leavesformed after treatments. Generally, antitranspirants can be efficient up to one month (Plaut et al., 2004). Itsmay allow a reduction in water transpiration without greatly affecting photosyntheticactivity (Glenn et al., 2001). In addition to the beneficial effect of elevated CO2 concentration on drought stress,antitranspirants can significantly improve drought tolerance(Del Amor et al., 2010).

 

Typically, an antitranspirant film mechanically reduces stomataland cuticle transpiration (i.e., water loss) as well as gaseous exchange (Osswald et al., 1984), although such a reduction inphotosynthetic activity and transpiration is generally perceivedto be accompanied by lower yield. It isalso impossible to reduce evapotranspiration without influencinggaseous exchange. Thus, the relationship between water andCO2 rate could determine the efficacy and applicability of such an antitranspirant film.

 

  1. Tuber chemical composition

Data presented in Tables (3 and 4) showed thatincreasing irrigation level from 50 to 100% of ETo caused a significant increase in the tuber content of TSS (29.34%), vitamin C (29.18%),total carbohydrate (27.70%), total sugars (31.58 %), reducing sugars (36.36%), non-reducing sugars (28.26%), nitrogen content (26.35%), phosphorus content (5.17%), potassium content (56.77%) and protein (26.30%)compared to the control treatment (100% of ETo)for both seasons.

 

These results agreed with previous studies (Anita and Mauromicale, 2006; Erdem et al., 2006) which revealed that the reduced root development due to water stress limits the plant’s ability for nutrients uptake. However, growing potato with 80% irrigation regime based on cumulative pan evaporation recorded significantly higher NPK contents when compared with lower irrigation levels (Jayramaiah et al., 2005).

 

The results also revealed that application of soil conditioner up to 8 kg/fed. significantly increased all chemical composition characters of potato tuber. Application of soil conditioner at 8 kg/fed. recorded the maximum values of TSS (5.29%), vitamin C (16.57 mg/100 g FW),total carbohydrate (63.10%), total sugars (0.72 %), reducing sugars (0.14%), non-reducing sugars (0.58%), nitrogen (1.73%), phosphorus (0.39%), potassium (2.06%) and protein content (10.82%) in potato tubers, compared with other treatmentsas average for both seasons, in which control treatment gave the minimum values of these characters.

 

On the other hand, data presented in Tables (3 and 4)clearly indicated thatapplication of plant antitranspirant up to 0.50 l/fed.significantly increased all chemical composition of potato tubers.  The applications of antitranspirant at 0.50 l/fed.recorded the highest mean values ofTSS (5.39%), vitamin C (17.16 mg/100 g FW),total carbohydrate (62.29%), total sugars (0.72 %), reducing sugars (0.15%), non-reducing sugars (0.57 %), nitrogen (1.85%), phosphorus (0.40%), potassium (2.19 %) and protein content (11.55%), compared with other treatmentsas average of both seasons, in which the control treatment gave the minimum values of these characters.

 

Most of interaction effects between irrigation levels, soil conditioner and plant antitranspirant are highly significant with TSS, VC,total sugars, N, P, K and protein in both seasons, but the third interactions are not significant. On the other hand, increasing water stress caused a significant reduction in tuber starch and total carbohydrate contents. Such effects may be due to that water stress conditions increased the enzymatic pathway that breaks down the starch into glucose-fructose (reducing sugars) or may be due to decrease the rate of sugars transport (Zhongchum and Stutte, 1992). The decrease in tuber total carbohydrates because of water stress may be due to the reduction in leaf total chlorophyll content, thereby reduced the photosynthetic activity, and consequently decreased the tuber yield.

 

In the present study, vitamin C content significantly affected by the application of soil conditioner over the experimental period.The study demonstrated that the soil conditioner applied to potatoes had a positive effect on starch content and vitamin C content in their tubers. In another study with soil conditioner, Zarzecka et al. (2014) recorded an increased nitrogen and magnesium amounts in potato tubers compared with control. soil conditioner is a well-established product which is popular with farmers as it improves soil properties, boosts crop yields and is cost-effective (Trawczyński and Bogdanowicz, 2007; Piotrowska et al., 2012).

 

Antitranspirants regulates stomatal movement by influencing the guard cells around the stomatal pores and reduces loss of water but not intake of CO2.The most efficient and desirable antitranspirants are those which closes stomata while transpiration but produce no phytotoxic effects to plants (Gale and Hagan, 1966). Based on the present results, it could be recommended that irrigation of potato plants at 100% of ETo with application of soil conditioner (SAB) at 8 kg/fed.and spraying the plants with antitranspirant (Protone) at rate of 0.5 l/fed. was the most efficient treatment for tuber yield and tuber quality of potato plants grown in loamy soil (El-Nobaria region).

 

 

 

Table (2). Average values of potato yield and yield componentsfor the two seasons as affected by irrigation deficit, soil conditioner, antitranspirant and their interactions

 

Treatments

Average tuber weight (g)

Tuber yield/plant (g)

Gross tuber yield

(ton/fed.)

Tuber dry matter

(%)

Tuber water content (%)

Marketable tuber

(%)

A)Main effect of irrigation (% of ETo)

100

67.46

857.71

22.81

25.14

74.86

93.38

75

64.10

795.27

21.15

25.02

74.98

92.52

50

59.92

710.25

18.89

25.30

74.70

90.04

LSD (0.05)

0.49**

5.93**

0.16**

0.40

0.39

0.35**

B)Main effect of soil conditioner (g/fed.)

0

60.67

720.31

19.16

25.19

74.81

91.13

4

64.35

791.97

21.07

25.25

74.75

92.06

8

66.45

850.94

22.64

25.02

74.98

92.75

LSD (0.05)

0.63**

6.99**

0.19**

0.23

0.22

0.33**

C)Main effect of plant antitranspirant(l/fed.)

0

61.04

725.92

19.31

24.66

75.34

91.15

0.25

63.30

782.00

20.80

25.38

74.62

92.07

0.50

67.13

855.31

22.75

25.41

74.59

92.72

LSD (0.05)

0.93**

11.36**

0.30**

0.36

0.36

0.32**

Interactions effect

A X B

**

**

**

**

*

**

A X C

ns

ns

ns

ns

ns

**

B X C

ns

ns

ns

ns

ns

**

A X B X C

ns

ns

ns

ns

ns

ns

Means followed by same letter (s) within each column are not significantly different at 0.05 level of probability.

* Significant at 0.05 level of probability, ** Significant at 0.01 levels of probability and ns: not significant

 

 

Table(3).Average chemical composition of potato tuber for the two seasons as affected by irrigation deficit, soil conditioner, antitranspirant and their interactions

 

Treatments

TSS

(%)

VC

(mg/100g FW)

Total carbohydrates (%)

Total sugars

(%)

Reducing sugars (%)

Non-reducing sugar (%)

A)Main effect of irrigation (% of ETo)

100

5.51

17.53

63.80

0.75

0.15

0.59

75

4.85

15.42

55.94

0.65

0.13

0.52

50

4.26

13.57

49.96

0.57

0.11

0.46

LSD (0.05)

0.004**

0.03**

2.05**

0.004**

0.003**

0.02**

B)Main effect of soil conditioner (g/fed.)

0

4.42

14.14

50.43

0.59

0.12

0.46

4

4.90

15.79

56.17

0.65

0.13

0.52

8

5.29

16.57

63.10

0.72

0.14

0.58

LSD (0.05)

0.02**

0.10**

1.34**

0.005**

0.002**

0.02**

C)Main effect of plant antitranspirant(l/fed.)

0

4.37

13.90

50.43

0.59

0.12

0.47

0.25

4.85

15.45

56.99

0.65

0.13

0.52

0.50

5.39

17.16

62.29

0.72

0.15

0.57

LSD (0.05)

0.002**

0.01**

1.30**

0.003**

.006**

0.02**

Interactions effect

A X B

**

**

**

**

**

*

A X C

**

**

ns

**

ns

ns

B X C

**

**

**

**

**

ns

A X B X C

**

*

ns

ns

ns

ns

 

 

 

 

 

Table(4). Average Chemical composition of potato tuber for the two seasons as affected by irrigation deficit, soil conditioner, antitranspirant, and theirinteractions

 

Treatments

N

(%)

P

(%)

K

(%)

Protein (%)

A)Main effect of irrigation (% of ETo)

100

1.87

0.45

2.43

11.67

75

1.66

0.36

1.94

10.38

50

1.48

0.29

1.55

9.24

LSD (0.05)

0.01**

0.001**

0.01**

0.08**

B)Main effect of soil conditioner (g/fed.)

0

1.61

0.33

1.89

10.82

4

1.66

0.37

1.97

10.39

8

1.73

0.39

2.06

10.82

LSD (0.05)

0.01**

0.002**

0.02**

0.06**

C)Main effect of plant antitranspirant(l/fed.)

0

1.50

0.32

1.77

9.34

0.25

1.66

0.36

1.97

10.39

0.50

1.85

0.40

2.19

11.55

LSD (0.05)

0.002**

0.001**

0.002**

0.03**

Interactions effect

A X B

**

**

*

**

A X C

*

**

**

*

B X C

**

**

**

**

A X B X C

ns

*

*

ns

 

REFERNCES
Abd-Allah, S. A. M., A. M. El-Gamal, G. Abdel-Nasser and A. I. Ebida (1996). Effect of FoliCote antitranspirant on water use, water use efficiency, yield and yield characteristics of potato crop grown in calcareous soil. In Proceeding of 4th Arabic Conf., Mini, Egypt, 223-37.
Abd-Allah, S.A.M. (1996). Studies on the application of antitranspirant and water regimes on potatoes grown in calcareous soil. M.Sc. Thesis, Fac. of Agric.(Saba Basha),Alex. Univ. P.88.
Abdel-Nasser, G. (1991). Minimizing of water requirements in relation to plant growth and yield of tomatoes. Ph.D. Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture (Saba Bacha) – Alexandria University, 420p
Abdel-Nasser, G. (1993). Effect of some antitranspirants on growth, yield, water contents and water –use of squash plant. Assiut J. Agric. Sci., 24(2): 193-210.
Abdel-Nasser, G and A.M. EL-Gamal (1996). Effect of film-forming antitranspirant (FoliCote) on water status, growth and yield of sweet potato(Ipomra batatas, L.). Proceeding of fourth Arabic conference for horticultural crops, (25-28 March), EL-Minia,Egypt.
Ahmed, Y.M.A. (2014). Impact of spraying some antitranspirants on fruiting of williams bananas grown under Aswan region conditions. Stem Cell. 2014; 5(4):34-39.
Al-Aubiady, A. M. S. (2005). Physiological studied to improve growth, yield, tuber seed production and decrease the water stress in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Ph.D. Thesis, College of Agriculture and Forestry, Mosul University, Iraq.
AL-Desouki, M.I., I.E. Abd EL-Rahman, and A. F. Sahar (2009). Effect of some antitranspirants and supplementary irrigation on growth, yield and fruit quality of Sultani fig (Ficuscarica) grown in the Egyptian western coastal zone under rain fed. conditions. Res J Agric. Biol. Sci., 5: 899-908
Anita, L. and G. Mauromicale (2006). Physiological and growth response to moderate water deficit of off-season potatoes in a Mediterranean environment. Agric. Water Manag., 82(1-2), 193-209.
AOAC (1990). Official Methods of Analysis, 15th Ed., Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Inc., USA. Manure. Annals. Agric. Res., 24 (3): 466-473.
AOAD (2014). Arab Agricultural Statistic Year Book Vol. No.:( 34). Khartoum.
Bittelli, M., M. Flury, S. Campbell and E. Nichols (2001). Reduction of transpiration through foliar application of chitosan. Agric. & Forest Meteorology, 107: 167-175.
Bradford, K.J. and T.C. Hsiao (1982). Physiological responses to moderate water stress, P. 246-312. In: Lange, O.L., P.S. Nobel, C.B. Osmond and H. Ziegler (eds.) Physiological ecology II. Water relations and carbon assimilation. Encyclopedia of plant physiology. N.S. Vol 12 B.
Carter, M. R. and E. G. Gregorich (2008). Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis, Second Edition. Canadian Society of Soil Science; Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1264 pages.
Chapman, H. D. and P.F. Pratt (1978). Method of Analysis for Soil and Water. 2nd Ed., Chapter, 17pp: 150-161. Uni. Calif. Div. Agric. Sci. USA.
Chen, B.M. and W.M. Mellenthin (1981). Effect of harvest date on ripening capacity and post – harvest life of Anjou pears. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 106: 38-42.
Croker, J., R. Poss, C. Hartmann and S. Bhuthorndharaj (2004). Effects of recycled bentonite addition on soil properties, plant growth and nutrient uptake in a tropical sandy soil. Plant Soil, 267: 155-163.
Del Amor, F.M., P. Cuadra-Crespo, D.J. Walker, J.M. Camara and R. Madrid (2010). Effect of foliar application of antitranspirant on photosynthesis and water relations of pepper plants under different levels of CO2 and water stress. J. Plant Physiol., 167: 1232-1238.
Ding, S.L., Y.Z. Sun, C.N. Yang and B.H. Xu (2009). Removal of copper from aqueous solutions by bentonites and the factors affecting it. Min. Sci. Technol., 19:489-492.
El Khawaga, A. S. (2013).Response of Grand Naine banana plants grown under different soil moisture levels to antitranspirants application Asian J. Crop Sci., 5 (3) (2013), pp. 238-250
EL-Mesirry, D. S.  and M. A. Shama (2017). Impact of Irrigation Deficit, Soil Conditioner, and Antitranspirant on Growth and Quality of Potato Crop. Egypt. Acad. J. Biolog. Sci., 8(1): 49 – 59.
Erdem T., Y. Erdem, H. Orta and H. Okursoy (2006). Water-yield relationships of potato under different irrigation methods and regimens. Agric. Sci., 63(3): 226-231.
FAO (2012). FAO Statistical Database. Production. Crops. Rome, Italy.
http://faostat.fao.org/ (verified July 2013).
FAO (2010). FAOSTAT: FAO Statistics Division. August 11, 2010. Available in:
Ghosh, S.G., K. Asanuma, A. Kusutani and M. Toyota (2000). Effect of moisture stress at different growth stages on the amount of total nonstructural carbohydrate, nitrate reeducates activity and yield of potato. Japanese J. of Tropical Agric., 44(3): 158- 166.
Gaballah, M.S. and M. Moursy (2004). Reflectants application for increasing wheat plant tolerance against salt stress. Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 7: 956–962.
Gale, J. and R. M. Hagan) 1966(. Plant antitranspirants. Annual Review on Plant Physiology, 17: 269-282.
Glenn, D.M., T. Van Der Zwet, G. Puterka, P. Gundrum, and E. Brown (2001). Efficacy of kaolin-based particle films to control apple diseases. Online. Plant Health Progress.doi:10.1094/PHP-2001-0823-01-RShttp://www.plantmanagementnetwork.org.
Hassanpanah, D. (2010). Evaluation of potato cultivars for resistance against water deficit stress under in vivo conditions. Potato Res., 5: 383-392.
Ierna, A. (2009). Influence of harvest date on nitrate contents of three potato varieties for off-season production. J. Food Compos. Ana., 22: 551-555.
Ierna, A., G. Pandino, S. Lombardo and G. Mauromicale (2011). Tuber yield, water and fertilizer productivity in early potato as affected by a combination of irrigation and fertilization. Agric. Water Manage., 101: 35-41.
Iskander, A.L., E.M. Khald and A.S. Sheta (2011). Zinc and manganese sorption behavior by natural zeolit and bentonite. Ann. Agric. Sci., 56:43-48.
Jackson, M.L. (1973). Soil chemical analysis, Prentice Hall of India private limited, New Delhi, P. 498.
Jacob, M.B. (1951). Chemical analysis of food and food products d. Van Nostraut Company Inc. New York.
Jayramaiah, R., G.S. Thimme, M.V. Chalapathi, N. Devakumar, B.T. Rangaswamy, H.R. Basavarajappa and P.R. Phanikumar, (2005). Effect of Irrigation Regimes and Organic Manure Levels on Growth and Yield of Potato. Karnataka. J. Agric. Sci., 18(3): 783-785.
Kar, G. and A. Kumar (2007). Effects of irrigation and straw mulch on water use and tuber yield of potato in Eastern India. Agricultural Water Management, 94: 109- 116.
Karam, F., N. Amacha, S. Fahed, T. El Asmar and A. Domínguez (2014). Response of potato to full and deficit irrigation under semiarid climate: agronomic and economic implications. Agricultural Water Management, 142:144-151.
Kandil, A.A., A.N. Attia, M.A. Badawi, A.E. Sharief and W.A.H. Abido (2011). Effect of water stress and fertilization with inorganic nitrogen and organic chicken manure on yield and yield components of potato. Aust. J. Basic and Appl. Sci., 5(9): 997-1005
Karam, F., Y. Rouphacl, R. Lahoud, J. Breidi, G. Coll (2009). Influence of Genotypes and potassium Application Rates on Yield and potassium Use Efficiency of Potato. J. Agron., 8(1):27- 32.
Kashyap, P.S. and R.K. Panda (2003). Effect of irrigation scheduling on potato crop parameters under water stressed conditions. Agric. Water Manage., 59: 49-66.
Kettlewell, P.S., W. L. Heath, and I. M. Haigh (2010). Yield enhancement of droughted wheat by film antitranspirant application: rationale and evidence. Agri. Sci., 1: 143-147
Khalel, A. M. S. (2003). Effect of antitranspirant in improving water status, growth and yield of cucumber. In Proc. 2nd Sci.Conf. Plant Prod., 49-59.
Khalil, S.E. (2006). Physiological study on sesame plants grown under saline water irrigation condition. Ph. D. Thesis, Cairo Univ., 229 pp.
Leskovar, D. I., S. Goreta, J. L. Jifon, S. Agehara, T. Shinohara and D. Moore (2008). ABA To enhance water stress tolerance of vegetable transplants. Acta Horticulture, 782: 253–264.
Leskovar, D. I., T. Shinohara, S. Agehara and B. Patil (2011). Integrated approaches for annual artichoke production in southwest Texas. Acta Horticulture, 942: 235–238.
Levy, D., W. K. Coleman and R. E. Veilleux (2013). Adaptation of potato to water shortage: irrigation management and enhancement of tolerance to drought and salinity. Am. J. Potato Res., 90:186–206
Lipe, W. N. (1979). Antitranspirants look promising on Texas high plains potatoes. Texas Agriculture Progress, 25 (1): 26.
Lipe, W. N. and C. W. Wendt (1978). Effects of antitranspirants on yield, grade distribution and water use of potatoes. Amer. Potato. J., 55 (4): 203-9.
Lowther, G.R. (1980). Using of a single H2So4 - H2O2 digest for the analysis of Pinus   radiate needles. Commun. Soil Sci. pl. Analysis, 11: 175-188.
Mahadevan, A. and R. Sridhar (1986). Methods in physiological plant pathology. Sirakami publications 326.
Malik, C.P. and M.B. Singh (1980). Plant enzymology and histo-enzymology. Atext manual, kalyani publisher, New Delhi.
Marisa, B.M.M., A.P.P. Paulor, C.C.B. Alberto, V. Nelio, G.A.M.R. Milton, B.F. Marcelo and S.B. Fernando (2009). Nutrient release by Brazilian sedimentary zeolite. An. Acad. Bras. Cienc., 81 (4), ISSN 0001- 3765.
Misra, A.K., B.K. Das, J. K. Datta, and G.C. De (2009). Effect of antitranspirants on water status and growth pattern of mulberry (Morus alba L.) under two levels of irrigation. Indian J. Agri. Res., 43: 144-147.
Moussa, S.A.M. (2012). Effect of FoliCote antitranspirant on sweet potato crop and water use efficiency under drip irrigation treatments. Plant production, Mansoura Univ., 3(12):2993-3009.
Nasraui, B. (1993). Role of antitranspirant films in protecting plants against fun-gal disease. Annals de l'Institute National de la Recherche Agronomique deTunisie,66: 125-135.
Onder, S., M.E. Caliskan, D. Onder and S. Caliskan (2005). Different irrigation methods and water stress effects on potato yield and yield components. Agricultural Water Management, 73(1): 73-86.
Osswald, W., M. Niehuss, W. Huber, and E. F. ELStner(1984). Support of non-host resistance by artificial leaf coating. J.Plant Dis. Prot. 91: 338-344.
Ouda, S.A., T. El-Mesiry and M.S. Gaballah(2007). Effect of using stabilizing agents on increasing yield and water use efficiency in barley grown under water stress. Aust. J. Basic Appl. Sci.,1: 571-577
Pereira, A.B. and C.C. Shock (2006). Development of irrigation best management practices for potato from a research perspective in the United States. Sakia.org e-publish, 1(1): 1-20.
Piotrowska, A., Długosz, J., Zamorski, R., Bogdanowicz, P. (2012). Changes in some biological and chemical properties of an arable soil treated with the microbial biofertilizer. Pol. J. Environ. Stud., 21(2): 455-463.
Plaut, Z., Y. Magril, and U. Kedem (2004). A new film formingmaterial, which reduces water vapour conductance more than CO2 fixation in several horticultural crops. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotech., 4: 528-532.
Shock, C.C., J.C. Zalewski, T.D. Stieber and D.S. Burnett (1992). Impact of early-season water deficits on Russet Burbank plant development, tuber yield and quality. Am. Potato J., 69: 793-803.
Sitthaphanit, S., C.W. Richard Bell and V. Limpinuntana (2010). Effect of clay amendments on nitrogen leaching and forms in a sandy soil. World Congress of Soil Science, Soil Solutions for a Changing World 1 – 6 August 2010, Brisbane, Australia.
Snedecor, G.W and W. G. Cochran (1980). Statistical Methods. Oxford and J.B.H. Bub.Com. 6th Edition.pp: 507.
STATISTIX (2003). Statistix 8.0, Analytical Software for Window. Tallahassee, FL.
Tambussi, E.A. and J. Bort (2007). Water use efficiency in C3 cereals under Mediterranean conditions: a review of physiological aspects. Ann. Appl. Biol. 150, 307–321.
Tandon, H. (1995). Methods of Analysis of soil, plants, waters and fertilizer, p: 144.  Fertilizers development and consultation organization, New Delhi, India.
Trawczyński, C. and P. Bogdanowicz (2007). Utilization of soil fertilizer in ecological aspect of potato cultivation. – J. Res. Appl. Agric. Engin., 52(4): 94-97.
Vanlauwe, B., A. Bationo, J. Chianu, K. Giller, R. Merckx, U. Mokwunye, O. Ohiokpehai, P. Pypers, R. Tabo and K. Shepherd (2010). Integrated soil fertility management operational definition and consequences for implementation and dissemination. Outlook Agric., 39:17–24.
Zarzecka, K., Gugała, M., Mystkowska, I., Sikorska, A. (2014). Influence of the soil conditioner on nitrogen, phosphorus and magnesium content in potato tubers. – Acta Sci. Pol. Agriculture, 13(2): 93-101.
Zhongchum, W. and G.W. Stutte (1992). The role of carbohydrates in active osmotic adjustment in apple under water stress. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 117 (5): 816-823.